Bug#166940: [Bug target/10984] x86/sse2 ICEs on vector intrinsics with constant argument

2003-07-27 Thread pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10984 pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added Las

Results for 3.2.3 (Debian) testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-07-27 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test === g++ Summary === # of expected passes7353 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures

Results for 3.2.3 (Debian) testsuite on i386-pc-linux-gnu

2003-07-27 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is i386-pc-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test === g++ Summary === # of expected passes7378 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures 88

Bug#202927: marked as done (gcc-3.3: Link order on Sparc: system directories vs specified directories)

2003-07-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 Jul 2003 14:32:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#202927: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.3ds9-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

gcc-3.2 override disparity

2003-07-27 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): gcc-3.2-base_3.2.3-7_i386.deb: package says priority is important, override says optional. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and

gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-7_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-07-27 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-7_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.3-7_all.deb cpp-3.2_3.2.3-7_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.3-7_i386.deb g++-3.2_3.2.3-7_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g++-3.2_3.2.3-7_i386.deb g77-3.2-doc_3.2.3-7_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-

gcc-3.2_3.2.3ds9-7_sparc.changes ACCEPTED

2003-07-27 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-3.2_3.2.3-7_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.3-7_sparc.deb g++-3.2_3.2.3-7_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g++-3.2_3.2.3-7_sparc.deb g77-3.2_3.2.3-7_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g77-3.2_3.2.3-7_sparc.deb gcc-3.2-base_3.2.3-7_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/g

Bug#119952: should bug #119952 be closed?

2003-07-27 Thread Jochen Voss
Hello, I suggest to simply close bug #119952 and friends. It is tagged wontfix and you won't get many new copies, because gcc-3.0 becomes out of fashion, now. I hope this helps, Jochen -- Omm (0)-(0) http://www.mathe

Bug#165635: [Bug java/8608] segmentation fault on compiling bad program

2003-07-27 Thread pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8608 pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added Last

Bug#203023: g++-2.95.4 woody/stable crashes on syntax error

2003-07-27 Thread Dom
Package: g++ Version: 2.95 official g++ Bug report here: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11681 The issue was marked as resolved because soon they are dropping support for gcc 2.95.x. in favor of 3.x basically, by compiling this snippet with 'g++ -ggdb t.cpp'