PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11370
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11370
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-09
03:50 ---
Subject: Bug 11370
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11370
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hi,
I tried to check but cannot reproduce your problem.
I can install gcc-3.3 fine.
First of all, could you check if you have disk failures ?
(dmesg, etc.)
Maybe your file system ? (I am using ext3)
Dunno.
regards,
junichi
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Aug 5 19:17:48 UTC 2003
Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/empty6.C (test for warnings, line 6)
FAIL: g++.eh/spec3.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.eh/sp
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Aug 5 19:17:48 UTC 2003
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes8039
# of unexpected successes 1
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Aug 5 19:17:48 UTC 2003
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: calls run
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: cxxtest run
FAIL: field run
FAIL: final_method run
FAIL: findclass run
FAIL: invoke run
FAIL: mart
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Aug 5 19:17:48 UTC 2003
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/tls/init-2.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes
chill_2.95.4-23_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-23_i386.deb
(new) cpp-doc_3.3.1-1_i386.deb standard devel
Documentation for the GNU C preprocessor (cpp)
Documentation for the GNU C preprocessor in info (dependency package).
cpp_3.3.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cp
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.1-0pre0
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The latest version of gcc-3.3 (3.3.1-1) cannot be installed. apt complains
as follows:
#apt-get install gcc-3.3
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages wil
Your message dated 08 Aug 2003 16:44:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204580: g++: unexpected output using variadic functions in
classes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
"Frank B. Brokken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> class Foo
> {
> va_list list;
>
> public:
> Foo(int n, ...)
> {
> va_start(list, n);
> }
> Foo(Foo const &other)
> {
> va_copy(list, other.list);
> }
> ~Foo(
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 13:35, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> So how to act for two bugs?:
>
> #203322: python2.2: Python fails with illegal instruction during
> postinst on sparc32
> #203324: libc6: __strtod_internal fails with illegal instruction on
> sparc32.
>
> Keeping them as "Critical"
At Thu, 7 Aug 2003 07:33:09 +0200,
Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Wed, 2003-08-06 17:22:19 -0400, Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:08:22PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > Jan-Benedict Glaw writes:
> >
> > Someone is
"Frank B. Brokken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> class Foo
> {
> va_list list;
>
> public:
> Foo(int n, ...)
> {
> va_start(list, n);
> }
> void bar() const
> {
> va_list l(list);
> cout << "Saw " << va_arg(l,
Package: g++
Version: 3:3.3-2
Severity: normal
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux suffix 2.4.21 #1 Fri Aug 1 13:53:33 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages g++ depends on:
ii cpp 3:3.3-2The GNU C pre
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11716
--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at redhat dot com 2003-08-08 06:36
---
Subject: Re: [mips] branch out of range when building fold-const.c
"doko at cs dot tu-berlin
17 matches
Mail list logo
