Bug#207444: gcc-3.3: gcc version selection doesn't work as expected

2003-08-26 Thread Nathanael Nerode
The -V feature is deprecated upstream and will hopefully be abandoned sometime soon (though GCC developers generally leave old cruft around for a *long* time). Just don't use it. :-/

Bug#207444: gcc-3.3: gcc version selection doesn't work as expected

2003-08-26 Thread Anand Kumria
Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre1 Severity: normal Hi there, I only discovered recently that gcc has a '-V' argument to select the version of the compiler to be used for compilation. It'd be great if the third command listed here also worked. For the record I have gcc-2.95, gcc-3.0, gcc-3.

Fw: Debian-gcc copy any DVD to a standart CD at home PlnfPiT

2003-08-26 Thread xaxyjis
Title: JyYiqUb Hello, Debian-gcc! utpwtgT good day! Tl rGb 'Here's your skateboard' GqAEA the U.S. Qy

Re: dpkg bus error on sparc/unstable: Re: Bits from the RM

2003-08-26 Thread Phil Edwards
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:29:09PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > > > > vore:~> dpkg > > Bus error > > Well, if I compile lib/myopt.c and lib/startup.c, without -O2, I get no bus > error. Maybe this is a gcc issue? FWIW, the comment here http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366

Re: dpkg bus error on sparc/unstable: Re: Bits from the RM

2003-08-26 Thread Adam Heath
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Adam Heath wrote: > Well, if I compile lib/myopt.c and lib/startup.c, without -O2, I get no bus > error. Maybe this is a gcc issue? gcc 3.2 also fails, but 2.95 works fine, no errors. lib/myopt.c(loadcfgfile) doogie: Did that ever stop anything from breaking? with -O2, i

dpkg bus error on sparc/unstable: Re: Bits from the RM

2003-08-26 Thread Adam Heath
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Mon, 25 Aug 2003 19:01:14 -0500 (CDT), > Adam Heath wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > > > It was reported by joshk on IRC, but I'm not still clear where this > > > problem come from. Example: > > > > > > ultra30:~> dpkg -s

Bug#207269: marked as done (gcc-3.3: require semi-colon after do{}while())

2003-08-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2003 12:16:42 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#207269: gcc-3.3: require semi-colon after do{}while() has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Glibc, libstdc++, RedHat

2003-08-26 Thread Alex Tibbles
Please accept my apologies if this is OT - it's possibly a bug report, definitely a query. My development machine: Debian Testing as of 20030826, (except postgresql, postgresql-client, postgresql-dev version 7.2.1). libstdc++5 libstdc++5-dev libstdc++5-3.3-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ which gcc

Bug#207269: gcc-3.3: require semi-colon after do{}while()

2003-08-26 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 06:00:31AM +0200, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > Package: gcc-3.3 > Version: 1:3.3.1-0pre0 > Severity: normal > Tags: upstream > > GCC, for C and C++, doesn't require any semi-colon after a while(){} > structure (and shouldn't, AFAIK), but require it after a do{}while(). > > Comp