Bug#216280: g++-3.3: lvalue evaluated twice for ?: operator

2003-10-19 Thread Jason Kraftcheck
Falk Hueffner wrote: Jason Kraftcheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The output of the following code, when compiled with g++-3.3 is '2'. It should be '1'. I cannot reproduce this with g++-3.3 1:3.3.2-0pre5.0.1 (3.3.2 20031005) on Alpha. Maybe it's target specific. I just tried it with pre5 and i

Bug#211783: please recheck with final gcc-3.3.2 release

2003-10-19 Thread FreddyK.
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 00:45:57 +0200 Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please could you recheck? It's supposed to be fixed in 3.3.2-1. > Unfortunately it is not. Linux version 2.4.22-lp8 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc-Version 3.3.2 (Debian)) #7 Mo Okt 20 02:31:36 CEST 2003 -oldconfig, ide-

Bug#216616: gcc-3.2: floating point problem with athlon thunderbird

2003-10-19 Thread Alban Browaeys
Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.3-8 Severity: normal I am not used to go this deep in code, i would appreciate any critisicm regarding this report and the time you use on it.i If you think this have nothing to do with gcc , i d be happy with this being reassigned to the proper maintenair. Is it o

Bug#211783: please recheck with final gcc-3.3.2 release

2003-10-19 Thread Matthias Klose
Please could you recheck? It's supposed to be fixed in 3.3.2-1.

Processed: your mail

2003-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 215445 wishlist Bug#215445: gcj-3.3: no compila un archivo Severity set to `wishlist'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database

Bug#216280: g++-3.3: lvalue evaluated twice for ?: operator

2003-10-19 Thread Falk Hueffner
Jason Kraftcheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The output of the following code, when compiled with g++-3.3 is '2'. It > should be '1'. I cannot reproduce this with g++-3.3 1:3.3.2-0pre5.0.1 (3.3.2 20031005) on Alpha. Maybe it's target specific. -- Falk

Bug#216234: g++-3.3: template function triggers syntax error

2003-10-19 Thread Falk Hueffner
Thimo Neubauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The following code shows that g++ reports a syntax error if the > method-call is inside a template-function but not if it's inside a > normal function: The Compaq compiler also rejects it. I'm pretty sure it's the expected behaviour, but somebody else

Results for 3.3.2 (Debian) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-10-19 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu === libjava tests === Running target unix FAIL: calls run FAIL: cxxtest run FAIL: field run FAIL: final_method run FAIL: findclass run FAIL: invoke run FAIL: martin run FAIL: noclass run FAIL: overload run FAIL: registe

Results for 3.3.2 (Debian) testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-10-19 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test === g++ Summary === # of expected passes8087 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures

Bug#216473: gcc-3.3: Transient compile error after long build (mozilla-thunderbird)

2003-10-19 Thread Falk Hueffner
Derrik Pates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For some reason, during the compilation of mozilla-thunderbird, I > get the following error from gcc: > > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > {standard input}:5454: Error: value of 3f91f4fc000840d8 too large for field > of 4 bytes at 002