Your message dated 20 Oct 2003 08:50:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#216280: g++-3.3: lvalue evaluated twice for ?: operator
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Alban Browaeys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it ok that double operators give diferents results with athlon TB
> than with other processors ?
No. But of course gcc can do nothing about it if it is the case;
complain to the hardware vendor.
> extract from the real mozilla code (cf bug #203100)
2 matches
Mail list logo
