Eduard Bloch writes:
> severity 194345 grave
> tag 194345 + sid
> thanks
>
> It became worse. The last version cannot build my lufs package because
> of the astronomical memory usage. Even 2GB of virtual memory isn't
> enough.
it would be nice if you could tell us the file in question, the
comman
[CC to Ben]
Thomas, please could you recheck with gcc-3.3.2-1 from unstable?
Thomas Nemeth writes:
> Package: gcc-3.3
> Version: 3.3.2-0pre5
> Severity: critical
>
> Hi !
>
> I upgraded gcc yesterday :
>
> julie[gacc] cat /root/apt-200310201058.log | grep gcc
> Inst libgcc1 [1:3.3.
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110
zack at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ass
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110
zack at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 194345 grave
Bug#194345: g++ 3.3 needs to much memory / gets killed by OOM-killer
Bug#194513: Internal error: unbalanced parenthesis in operand 1
Severity set to `grave'.
> tag 194345 + sid
Bug#194345: g++ 3.3 needs to much memory / gets kille
severity 194345 grave
tag 194345 + sid
thanks
It became worse. The last version cannot build my lufs package because
of the astronomical memory usage. Even 2GB of virtual memory isn't
enough.
MfG,
Eduard.
--
Letzte Worte eines Turmspringers:
"Heute ist das Wasser aber klar!"
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110
--- Additional Comments From charlet at act-europe dot fr 2003-10-21 16:18
---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 regression] [mipsel-linux]ada bootstrap error
> The other error _is_
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2003-10-21 16:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=4973)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4973&action=view
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2003-10-21 15:58 ---
The other error _is_ ada specific, which is trying to use BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT
outside the compiler.
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12450
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12450
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hi,
yet more info for this bug: it may be related to #185604 (also
reported by me :) but isn't the same. First of all, the program from
#185604 compiles fine with gcc 3.3.2 (no wonder as it went into the
regression tests) and the error is different. In the old bug the
compiler parsed the specializ
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 3.3.2-0pre5
Severity: critical
Hi !
I upgraded gcc yesterday :
julie[gacc] cat /root/apt-200310201058.log | grep gcc
Inst libgcc1 [1:3.3.2-0pre4] (1:3.3.2-0pre5 Debian:testing)
Inst gcc-3.3-base [1:3.3.2-0pre4] (1:3.3.2-0pre5 Debian:testing)
Inst gcc-3.3
Hi,
Am 19.10.2003 um 23:52 schrieb Falk Hueffner:
> The Compaq compiler also rejects it. I'm pretty sure it's the expected
> behaviour, but somebody else should check.
In my copy of Stroustrups book (german version, 4th edition) there's a
short passage in Appendix A.9 talking about parsing of
tem
15 matches
Mail list logo