[Bug target/12717] [3.4 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap error in stage3

2003-10-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12717 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Processed: retitle, patch added

2003-10-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 217541 ffi.h's ffi_type_[us]long bogus on x86 Bug#217541: fficonfig.h bogus on x86 Changed Bug title. > tags 217541 + patch Bug#217541: ffi.h's ffi_type_[us]long bogus on x86 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processi

Bug#217541: fficonfig.h bogus on x86

2003-10-25 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As you can easily see, the two pointers refer to the same object, which > means fficonfig.h #defines ffi_type_ulong to ffi_type_uint64, which is > plain wrong on a 32bit platform. > s/fficonfig.h/ffi.h/ The way ffi.h #defines the ffi_type_XX equival

Bug#217541: fficonfig.h bogus on x86

2003-10-25 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Package: libffi2-dev Version: 1:3.3.2-1 Severity: important Running this little test program on my Athlon (no, not an Athlon64 ;-)): #include #include int main () { printf ("&ffi_type_ulong: %p &ffi_type_uint64: %p\n", &ffi_type_ulong, &ffi_type_uint64); } results in: &ffi_type_

[Bug c++/12765] [3.3.2 regression] 2GB mem not enough for sucessful compile

2003-10-25 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12765 ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Processed: Re: Bug#194345: [edi@gmx.de: Re: Bug#194345: FTB the lufs package]

2003-10-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 194345 important Bug#194345: g++ 3.3 needs to much memory / gets killed by OOM-killer Bug#194513: Internal error: unbalanced parenthesis in operand 1 Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you nee

Bug#194345: [edi@gmx.de: Re: Bug#194345: FTB the lufs package]

2003-10-25 Thread Matthias Klose
severity 194345 important thanks this case is not related to original report. reverting the severity of the report to the old severity. The new bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12765 the severity of this report is not RC, as there is a workaround using g++-3.2. Eduard Bloch writes: