Results for 3.3.2 (Debian) testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test === g++ Summary === # of expected passes8087 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures

Results for 3.3.2 (Debian) testsuite on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test === g++ Summary === # of expected passes8108 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures 94

Results for 3.3.2 (Debian) testsuite on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test === g++ Summary === # of expected passes7874 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures

Results for 3.3.2 (Debian) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu === libjava tests === Running target unix FAIL: calls run FAIL: cxxtest run FAIL: field run FAIL: final_method run FAIL: findclass run FAIL: invoke run FAIL: martin run FAIL: noclass run FAIL: overload run FAIL: registe

Results for 3.3.2 (Debian) testsuite on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o compile UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o execut

[Bug target/13041] [3.3 Regression] linux-2.6/sound/core/oss/rate.c miscompiled

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-13 19:37 --- On the mainline the asm looks like: movw(%edi), %ax movw%ax, (%esp) -- What|Removed |Added -

Hey... What's up? Dhveb

Hey, Just wanted to let you know to check out my web site. http://www.taynow.wisesurfer.net/ukiwe/ukiwe16.htm KmXifnpqpfk

Bug#219595: marked as done (libffi2: Licensing problems)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Nov 2003 08:04:57 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#219595: More information on building 'standalone' libffi has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Processed: Re: Processed: Looks like a toolchain issue to me.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 217768 important Bug#217768: gforth doesn't build on arm Severity set to `important'. > tags 217768 + moreinfo Bug#217768: gforth doesn't build on arm There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please con

Bug#217768: Processed: Looks like a toolchain issue to me.

severity 217768 important tags 217768 + moreinfo thanks The bug report is incomplete. - which version of gcc was used? - please attach the preprocessed source - is the error reproducible with gcc-3.2 and gcc-2.95?