--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2004-01-24
03:55 ---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 19:34, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Ok. I would prefer to implement that in a separate patch after we fix
> the bootstrap failure, though.
Yes, that is f
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-01-24 03:35
---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
Jim Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 17:50, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> This, I think, can be addressed with peephole2 patterns, which have
>> the ab
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2004-01-24
03:31 ---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 17:50, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> This, I think, can be addressed with peephole2 patterns, which have
> the ability to allocate scratch registers without
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-01-24 02:20
---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Zack Weinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> So, if you wouldn't mind trying the appended revision (changes only
>> ia64.c
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-01-24 01:56 ---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
"Zack Weinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, if you wouldn't mind trying the appended revision (changes only
> ia64.c)?
Unfortunately that didn't help, still the same proble
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-01-24 01:51
---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
Jim Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You mention reload nightmares. There is a reload nightmare only if you
> fight how reload works. If we allocate an OImode scratc
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-01-24 01:35
---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
Jim Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 00:47, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> Re-revised patch.
>
> On the REG/SUBREG issue, I was looking at your latest p
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-01-24 01:28
---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Zack Weinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> So, if you wouldn't mind trying the appended revision (changes only
>> ia64.c
--- Additional Comments From rth at redhat dot com 2004-01-24 00:29 ---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 10:32:51PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> strace shows that gnat1 wants to stat() "" three times, whereas the stage1
> compiler searches for "./system.ads",
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2004-01-24
00:18 ---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 00:47, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Re-revised patch.
On the REG/SUBREG issue, I was looking at your latest patch. In the
full context of the previous pa
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-01-24 00:04 ---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
"Zack Weinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, if you wouldn't mind trying the appended revision (changes only
> ia64.c)?
Does that mean that the changes in ia64.md from pr137
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-01-23 23:24
---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Zack Weinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I'm at a bit of a loss trying to find the miscompilation. It's going
>> wron
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2004-01-23
23:22 ---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 00:47, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Re-revised patch.
I started a bootstrap as soon as I saw the patch. It just failed. I
will try taking a look at this
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-01-23 22:58 ---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
"Zack Weinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm at a bit of a loss trying to find the miscompilation. It's going
> wrong somewhere either in Name_Find or Load_Source_File or th
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2004-01-23
22:55 ---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 23:43, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Under what circumstances should REG_INC notes be tagged onto the insns
> emitted here? It's currently done only for PO
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-01-23 22:18
---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Could you repeat the failing command with the added option -gnatdl,
>> and send me the output?
>
> Unfortunately, there is no
a/ada.o -v
>> Reading specs from stage2/specs
>> Configured with: ../configure --host=ia64-suse-linux --enable-shared
>> --enable-threads --with-system-zlib
>> Thread model: posix
>> gcc version 3.5.0 20040123 (experimental)
>> stage2/gnat1 -I- -I. -Iada -I../../gcc/
nux --enable-shared
> --enable-threads --with-system-zlib
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 3.5.0 20040123 (experimental)
> stage2/gnat1 -I- -I. -Iada -I../../gcc/ada -quiet -dumpbase ada.ads -g
> -gnatpg -gnata -O2 -gnatO ada/ada.o ../../gcc/ada/ada.ads -o /tmp/ccR0NvnR.s
>
inux/bin/ -c -g -O2
-gnatpg -gnata -I- -I. -Iada -I../../gcc/ada ../../gcc/ada/ada.ads -o ada/ada.o
-v
Reading specs from stage2/specs
Configured with: ../configure --host=ia64-suse-linux --enable-shared
--enable-threads --with-system-zlib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.5.0 20040123 (experime
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
New patch file with Falk's documentation correction fixed (GNU math libraries
- -> GCC libc math libraries) attached. Thanks Falk.
- -T
PS (again): This patch is meant to be applied directly against the current
tree (i.e. the tree that only conta
Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It takes about 2.5G to compile. gcc-snapshot (3.4) is not better. An
> older tree-ssa snapshot I happend to have lying around however only
> takes about 130M, so it's probably a RTL optimizer going haywire.
Today's 3.4 takes 413M, and today's tree-ssa 2
Title: cleanactpro
Keep Your Job - Keep Your Marriage - Keep Out Of Trouble
DID YOU
KNOW!
That anyone who uses your computer can see what websites you've
visited?
And that simply deleting history only removes part of the records.
If someone starts typing a web site, your browser will recall
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 228018 + upstream
Bug#228018: gcc-3.3: [alpha] cc1 Internal error when building fceu-0.97.5
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
tags 228018 + upstream
thanks
Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> gcc -Wall -g -O2 -Wall -Winline -DOPENGL -DFRAMESKIP -DSTDIOIFACE \
> -DUNIXDSP -DNETWORK -DFPS `sdl-config --cflags` -Izlib \
> -fomit-frame-pointer -DSDL -DUNIX -DPSS_STYLE=1 -DZLIB -c -o x6502.o \
> x6502.c
> x6502.c: I
Tyson Whitehead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > please reuse the original report. Falk has to approve it anyway.
>
> Done deal. Just awaiting Falk now.
Patch looks OK, except
++DEBIAN SPECIFIC: This option is on by default, unless
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (which is part of the @option{-ffast-math}
++
Hi, Debian-gcc!
I am a frien2d of Tadzi. He said thaJt you need VIAGR5A. On th4is site it
cosqts $1.32 per pacqk. http://www.pvmsolutions.com/index.php?pid=evaph5545
Best regards, Paulus
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-01-23 08:48
---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
Re-revised patch.
zw
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-01-23 08:48
---
Created an attachment (id=5560)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/b
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-01-23 08:35
---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 11:43:40PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> +out[0] = adjust_automodify_address
>> +
--- Additional Comments From rth at redhat dot com 2004-01-23 08:24 ---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 11:43:40PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> + out[0] = adjust_automodify_address
> + (in, DImode, gen_rtx_POST_INC (Pmode, base), 0);
> +
> +
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-01-23 07:43
---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Still doesn't fly.
Revised patch follows.
Under what circumstances should REG_INC notes be tagged onto the insns
emitted here
30 matches
Mail list logo
