Hi.
> Ben, please could you update the status regarding newer gcj-3.3 /
> gcc-snapshot packages?
Still broken with both gcj 4:3.3.2-2 and gcc-snapshot 20040118-1.
Ben.
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-02-02
02:10 ---
I think I'll confirm it because EDG and MSVC71 have the same behaviour of GCC
3.2.3, but I can't see wording in the standard which speaks about what should
happen in this case.
Maybe this could be a defect
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-02-01 22:29 ---
This is the change that re-triggered the bug:
2004-01-09 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* expr.h (expand_expr): Make it a macro, not a function.
(expand_expr_real): New function.
*
--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2004-02-01 17:24
---
Then we need something like an un-cse pass.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11877
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
4 matches
Mail list logo