[Bug c++/11295] [3.4/3.5 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-lang.c:314 when using a non-trivial object in a compound statement expression

2004-02-02 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-02-03 00:06 --- It's ia64 specific. See and . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11295 --

[Bug c++/13944] [3.3/3.4/3.5] exception in constructor of a class to be thrown is not caught

2004-02-02 Thread bangerth at dealii dot org
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-02-02 23:18 --- I think I remember that there is a duplicate of this and that it was stated that it is up to the implementation what it does in this case: the problem is throwing while generating the argument to a throw-stat

[Bug libstdc++/13924] #include imports partial definition of std::abs

2004-02-02 Thread bangerth at dealii dot org
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-02-02 23:16 --- *** Bug 13943 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/13943] call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous

2004-02-02 Thread bangerth at dealii dot org
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-02-02 23:16 --- This is a duplicate of PR 13924. W. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 13924 *** -- What|Removed |Added -

Bug#210716: jython causes kaffe to fail with assert error

2004-02-02 Thread Ben Burton
> well, I still could reenable building gij-3.2 / gcj-3.2, if that's > necessary for the sarge release. I don't have any reason to believe that this bug is new to gcj-3.3 - the only reason it wasn't spotted until now was kaffe+jython used to be broken for other reasons. So it's entirely possible

[Bug c++/11295] [3.4/3.5 regression] ICE in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-lang.c:314 when using a non-trivial object in a compound statement expression

2004-02-02 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-02-02 17:45 --- I could not reproduce this on the 3.4 branch on i686-pc-linux-gnu. Is it still happening? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11295 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- Yo

Re: gcc 3.3.3

2004-02-02 Thread Falk Hueffner
Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When I put a constant infront of methods in a class the application > uses to segfault. When I put it at the end the application just > works as expected. Sorry, I don't understand. Please file a bug with a complete example to reproduce the problem.

gcc 3.3.3

2004-02-02 Thread Markus Rechberger
When I put a constant infront of methods in a class the application uses to segfault. When I put it at the end the application just works as expected. Please revert to something below gcc 3.3.3 looks like it's really buggy Markus

[Bug c++/13944] [3.3/3.4/3.5] exception in constructor of a class to be thrown is not caught

2004-02-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |3.3.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13944 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---