--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-30
00:51 ---
So closing as fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 11:37:20PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
> > I'm trying to build the gcc-3.3 package but I seem to have a
> > dependency problem building it.
> >
> > gcc-3.3 depends on gnat-3.3 | gnat-3.2
> > gnat-3.2 (gcc-3.2) depends on gnat-3.2
> > gnat (3.15p) depe
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-03-29 22:33
---
Uncomfirmed here only means that we have no small testcase, which is one
of our requirements to put something into "confirmed" mode. It is
certainly on our radar!
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho
--- Additional Comments From 1319 at bot dot ru 2004-03-29 21:52 ---
Why this bug is still UNCONFIRMED? I cannot compile mozilla using 3.3.4 20040328
too. Also 3.4.0 never compiles working mozilla (I tried many times from early
2004).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> I'm trying to build the gcc-3.3 package but I seem to have a
> dependency problem building it.
>
> gcc-3.3 depends on gnat-3.3 | gnat-3.2
> gnat-3.2 (gcc-3.2) depends on gnat-3.2
> gnat (3.15p) depends on gnat (>= 3.14) gnat (<< 3.16)
>
> And I don't have any version of gnat
I'm trying to build the gcc-3.3 package but I seem to have a
dependency problem building it.
gcc-3.3 depends on gnat-3.3 | gnat-3.2
gnat-3.2 (gcc-3.2) depends on gnat-3.2
gnat (3.15p) depends on gnat (>= 3.14) gnat (<< 3.16)
And I don't have any version of gnat.
What I do have is gcc-3.3 version
--- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2004-03-29 19:25
---
Strange since the code I deleted was, in fact, optimization code for combine.
So, my patch did _less_ than we did before. This is probably exposing a bug
somewhere else in the compiler, but I'll take a look and
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-29
19:03 ---
Subject: Bug 13562
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_3-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-29 19:03:24
Modified files:
gcc: Change
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-29
18:32 ---
Since firefox and mozilla are so close in that they share so many files, the
bug is the same as the same
file exhibits the bug in both applications as they are very closely related
programs.
--
http:/
Package: libgcj4
Version: 1:3.3.3-5
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #240550
Running the program with strace shows that two sockets are created (fd 5
and 6). The second socket (fd 6) is the one that is later given an
address with bind(2), the first socket (fd 5) is the one that is used in
the se
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-29
16:37 ---
*** Bug 14772 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14640
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watch
--- Additional Comments From trentalg at aston dot ac dot uk 2004-03-29
16:40 ---
Andrew, I already submitted another bug and then got your reply sorry.
Anyway, the application are different, although the behaviour is similar: this
bug is about compiling Firefox while the new one I
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-03-29 16:33
---
Gaby: are you aware of this regression on the 3.3 branch due to a
backported patch? We could avoid this is we undo the regression
by reverting the backport and simply stick with the breakage
of PR 10776.
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-29
16:29 ---
We just did not know if this was also a 3.4 (or 3.5) regression at all, please
do NOT file another bug.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From trentalg at aston dot ac dot uk 2004-03-29
16:09 ---
I confirm the same problem when building Mozilla 1.7 (CVS) using gcc 3.4.0
2004-03-29 (CVS).
The problem disappears after reverting the backport for PR10776 and re-building
Mozilla.
Unfortunately, this bu
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14700
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-29
09:15 ---
And even from 3.3.2.
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|3.4.0 3.5.0
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-29
10:27 ---
The regression was introduced by:
2003-05-14 Eric Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* combine.c: Fix header comments.
(distribute_notes): Remove usage of elim_i1, elim_i2. Propagate
19 matches
Mail list logo
