Results for 3.4.1 (Debian 3.4.1-5) testsuite on powerpc-linux

2004-08-03 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 31 06:57:45 UTC 2004 Native configuration is powerpc-linux (mojito) === gpc tests === Running target any === gpc Summary === # of tests3953 # of expected passes 3948 # of unsupported tests5 /home/packages/gcc/3.4/g

[Bug rtl-optimization/13882] ICE on compiling unwind-ia64.c during stage1 (profiledbootstrap)

2004-08-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE on compiling unwind-|ICE on compiling unwind- |ia64.c during stage1|ia64.c during stage1

Re: Instead of the amd64 GR: rudimentary amd64 support for sarge, need sponsor.

2004-08-03 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hi, On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 10:35:29PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > There have been some reports of gcc-3.4 miscompiling the kernel but I > think that was fixed. It was the gcc-3.3 version with activated hammer branch for amd64 creating broken kernels. gcc-3.4 is fine for building Linux

Re: Instead of the amd64 GR: rudimentary amd64 support for sarge, need sponsor.

2004-08-03 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I spent some time talking with the glibc maintainers about this. These > are all my own opinions, but the others seemed to agree with me. > > I think this would be a very good idea. > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:12:19PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow

Important News From Lucien Burns

2004-08-03 Thread Lucinda Crockett
Dear Home   Bu y e r: Congratulations! You have been pre - appr.oved for a new home mortga g e. Below are the specifications of your approv a l Lo a n  Type: Conventional Interest Ra t e: 3.5% Term: 360 months Sales Price: $250,000 (Maximum) Down Paym e n t: 10% Lock-in Period: 45 days Closing

Bug#263019: Acknowledgement (gcc-3.4_3.4.1-5 doesn't work with binutils oldet tha 2.15)

2004-08-03 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 the mental interface of Debian Bug Tracking System told: > Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian. [...] Please can one tell me why I don't get all the mess reported to Bug#263019, which I initialized? BTW: We need binutils 2.15 to run gcc-3.4_3.4.1-5

Re: Instead of the amd64 GR: rudimentary amd64 support for sarge, need sponsor.

2004-08-03 Thread Rene Engelhard
Daniel Burrows wrote: > gcc-3.4 is part of base, since it provides libgcc1 now. and gcc-3.3 also because of libstdc++5... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Gnu

Re: Instead of the amd64 GR: rudimentary amd64 support for sarge, need sponsor.

2004-08-03 Thread Daniel Burrows
gcc-3.4 is part of base, since it provides libgcc1 now. Daniel -- / Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---\ | We are Debian of Borg.| | You will be packaged.

Re: Instead of the amd64 GR: rudimentary amd64 support for sarge, need sponsor.

2004-08-03 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:28:23PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: > gcc-3.4 is part of base, since it provides libgcc1 now. Oops. OK, it would have to be a separate GCC source package or depend on a new version of toolchain-source then. We could do this just for sarge and build it from gcc-3.4 i

Re: Instead of the amd64 GR: rudimentary amd64 support for sarge, need sponsor.

2004-08-03 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
I spent some time talking with the glibc maintainers about this. These are all my own opinions, but the others seemed to agree with me. I think this would be a very good idea. On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:12:19PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Hi, > > given the current sarge deadline and th

[Bug c++/16706] [3.4/3.5 Regression] ICE in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:2126

2004-08-03 Thread lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-03 15:25 --- Patch submitted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-08/msg00151.html -- What|Removed |Added --

Bug#250185: marked as done (/usr/sbin/sshd: sshd immediately crashes with "Illegal instruction" on armv4l)

2004-08-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 3 Aug 2004 09:06:27 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#250185: /usr/sbin/sshd: sshd immediately crashes with "Illegal instruction" on armv4l has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#253149: marked as done (ssh client segfaulting on strongARM -- OpenSSH_3.8p1 Debian)

2004-08-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 3 Aug 2004 09:06:27 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#250185: /usr/sbin/sshd: sshd immediately crashes with "Illegal instruction" on armv4l has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#263019: This bug is definitely RC

2004-08-03 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-02 15:08]: > > > > If gcc-3.4 requires binutils (>= 2.15) the dependencies need an update. > > > you didn't give any reason. downgrading. > > According to this bug gcc-3.4_3.4.1-5 uses the --as-needed option of > ld which is new i

gcc-3.4_3.4.1ds1-5_powerpc.changes REJECTED

2004-08-03 Thread Debian Installer
Rejected: gcc-3.4_3.4.1ds1-5_powerpc.changes: a file with this name already exists in the Accepted directory. Rejected: cpp-3.4_3.4.1-5_powerpc.deb file already exists in the Accepted directory. Rejected: gpc-2.1-3.4_3.4.1-5_powerpc.deb file already exists in the Accepted directory. Rejected: g

Processing of gcc-3.4_3.4.1ds1-5_powerpc.changes

2004-08-03 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-3.4_3.4.1ds1-5_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-3.4-base_3.4.1-5_powerpc.deb libgcc1_3.4.1-5_powerpc.deb cpp-3.4_3.4.1-5_powerpc.deb gobjc-3.4_3.4.1-5_powerpc.deb gij-3.4_3.4.1-5_powerpc.deb libgcj5_3.4.1-5_powerpc.deb gcj-3.4_3.4.1-5_po

Bug#263019: This bug is definitely RC

2004-08-03 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-02 15:08]: > > > If gcc-3.4 requires binutils (>= 2.15) the dependencies need an update. > > you didn't give any reason. downgrading. According to this bug gcc-3.4_3.4.1-5 uses the --as-needed option of ld which is new in 2.15-1. If this is true, then not

Olivia

2004-08-03 Thread Marisol Winslow
Hello Heidi, Danielle said that the bank denied them again... Just go here and get it done please... We have to start this remodel as soon as possible k? Stop wasting time. http://drivendesert.net/prime/Timpana/index.htm Ensure that you visit the link in 24 hrs to confirm your eligibility. Y

Re: Request details at Tue, 03 Aug 2004 04:15:35 -0500

2004-08-03 Thread Sheldon
A p proval  Letter Sheldon Trusted Bank Group Ref: 03163 Sir: this letter is to confirm that you have been a.pproved to ref i nance for a conventional mor t gage at 3.75% pending completion of your application. We have verified that you fit our mor t gage guidelines to qualify for our low

gcc-3.5_3.5ds1-0pre1_m68k.changes ACCEPTED

2004-08-03 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-3.5_3.5-0pre1_m68k.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.5/cpp-3.5_3.5-0pre1_m68k.deb fastjar_3.5-0pre1_m68k.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.5/fastjar_3.5-0pre1_m68k.deb fixincludes_3.5-0pre1_m68k.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.5/fixincludes_3.5-0pre1_m68k.deb g++-3.5_3.5-0pre1_m68k.deb to pool/main/g

Processing of gcc-3.5_3.5ds1-0pre1_m68k.changes

2004-08-03 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-3.5_3.5ds1-0pre1_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-3.5-base_3.5-0pre1_m68k.deb libgcc2_3.5-0pre1_m68k.deb cpp-3.5_3.5-0pre1_m68k.deb protoize_3.5-0pre1_m68k.deb fixincludes_3.5-0pre1_m68k.deb libmudflap0_3.5-0pre1_m68k.deb libmudflap0-dev_3.

[Bug target/16120] [3.5 Regression] bootstrap failure on arm-linux

2004-08-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-03 06:11 --- Can someone attach the preprocessed source file? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16120 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the repor