Dear customer!
We updated our software catalogue and added new
popular products! Now you can get any software item
at 90% discount rate! For more information visit us here:
http://twill.infostech.info/index.php?s=4241
With best regards,
Product Manager
Miles Fraser
--- Additional Comments From bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-01
01:15 ---
there is a mistake on line 308 of malloc.c:
diff -r1.12.14.1 malloc.c
308c308
< t = (mallocArea_ *) (ptr - sizeof(mallocArea_));
---
> t = (mallocArea_ *) (ptr - sizeof(mallocArea_ *));
i should have al
Dear customer!
We updated our software catalogue and added new
popular products! Now you can get any software item
at 90% discount rate! For more information visit us here:
http://mollify.infostech.info/index.php?s=4241
With best regards,
Product Manager
Patsy Bergman
Dear customer!
We updated our software catalogue and added new
popular products! Now you can get any software item
at 90% discount rate! For more information visit us here:
http://mimi.infostech.info/index.php?s=4241
With best regards,
Product Manager
Emilia Muniz
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Aug 13 10:38:11 UTC 2004
Native configuration is sparc-linux (vore)
=== gpc tests ===
Running target any
=== gpc Summary ===
# of tests3910
# of expected passes 3905
# of unsupported tests5
/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.4/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 269280 normal
Bug#269280: libimage-exif-perl: ftbfs [sparc] jpeg.c compile does not complete
Severity set to `normal'.
> tags 269280 - sid
Bug#269280: libimage-exif-perl: ftbfs [sparc] jpeg.c compile does not complete
Tags were: sid
Tags remov
--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2004-08-31 21:29
---
Hi,
I've reported the GUI lockup as PR 17254.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16121
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> reassign 268816 gcc-3.3
Bug#268816: installation: apt-get fails for gcc-3.3 (trying to overwrite
.../gcc-3.3-base/changelog.Debian.gz)
Bug reassigned from package `installation' to `g
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-31
17:27 ---
> You're replacing both sizeof(mallocArea_) and sizeof(mallocArea_*) with
> a size based on sizeof(mallocArea_*) roundup up to the byte-version of
> BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT. OK, I ssee that mallocArea is itse
On 04-Aug-30 20:57, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I patched gcc-3.4 3.4.1ds1-7 with the patch in this bugreport, now it
> fails creating the biarch compiler, see attached buildd log.
>
> What am I missing?
The reason for the failure is that you need a compiler which already has
biarch sup
Hi,
Attaching the config log.
Greetings
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.
configure:581: checking host system type
configure:602: checking target system type
configure:620: c
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-08-31 15:11
---
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] nearly all g77 tests fail
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-31
>13:18 ---
>Created an att
Florian Weimer a écrit :
* Fabrice LORRAIN:
>> Therefore, it is not possible to install them in parallel.
Any reason not to use the same trick than for the other packages from
the suite (gcc, g77, gcj, gpc etc...). That is, have
/usr/bin/gnat*-version in the <> packages and provide a gnat-fsf pa
You need to install libc6-dev.
gcc-3.3 does not seem to depend on libc6-dev. Is this normal?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
---
Tiscali ADSL LIGHT, 19,95 EUR/mois pendant 6 mois, c'est le moment de faire
le pas!
http://reg.tiscali.be/
Florian Weimer a écrit :
* Fabrice LORRAIN:
Installing the full gcc suite on a sarge box, I discover that gnats-3.n
conflicts with all the preceding version.
I suppose you mean GNAT, not GNATS.
Yep.
Is there a particular reason for that ? I didn't find the
information greping the changelog.
All t
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.4-6sarge1.2
Severity: important
When running gcc on any file, I receive this error message:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot open crt1.o: No such file or directory
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
AP
* Fabrice LORRAIN:
>> Therefore, it is not possible to install them in parallel.
>
> Any reason not to use the same trick than for the other packages from
> the suite (gcc, g77, gcj, gpc etc...). That is, have
> /usr/bin/gnat*-version in the <> packages and provide a gnat-fsf package
> with th
Hi,
the test condition for amd64 is reversed in the last patch which
breaks amd64 and possibly sparc and s390.
Here is the same patch with reversed test.
MfG
Goswin
==
diff -Nurd gcc-3.3-3.3.4/debian/rules2 gcc-3.3-3.3.
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-31
13:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=7010)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7010&action=view)
Proposed fix.
Mark, does it look ok to you? It was bootstrapped/regtested (C,F77) on x86,
SPARC32 and
Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> gcc-3.3 enters what seems to be an infinite loop while building the
> jpeg.c file from libimage-exif-perl at -O2 (99% cpu usage, can sit
> there for hours without any progress).
Cute. Here's a test case:
int nxtmkr() {
while (jpg1byte())
re
--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2004-08-31 12:20
---
(In reply to comment #29)
> If you still can't build the gui-branch, can you file a new report with
> details.
Okay, it's PR 17249.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16121
--- You are rece
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.4-9
Severity: normal
Hi,
gcc-3.3 enters what seems to be an infinite loop while building the jpeg.c file
from libimage-exif-perl at -O2 (99% cpu usage, can sit there for hours without
any progress). This affects alpha, powerpc, s390 and sparc, according to the
buil
* Fabrice LORRAIN:
> Installing the full gcc suite on a sarge box, I discover that gnats-3.n
> conflicts with all the preceding version.
I suppose you mean GNAT, not GNATS.
> Is there a particular reason for that ? I didn't find the
> information greping the changelog.
All those packages provi
--- Additional Comments From bdavis9659 at comcast dot net 2004-08-31
10:39 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] nearly all g77 tests fail
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 01:37, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> What happens is that we allocate a new 'ffesymbol' in symbol.c:ffesymbol_n
On Sun, 2004-08-29 19:10:53 -0700, Chiqui Mercene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Any advice on how to use graphics using C in a GNU compiler...Thank you very
> much.
There's no "easy" way. I assume you're running on a Linux system. That
is, you don't have any direct a
--- Additional Comments From bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-31
09:31 ---
i don't know how to ensure that the result stays on a 64 bit boundary:
ptr = ptr + sizeof(mallocArea_*);
other than to make the offset 64 bits for everyone.
if desired, i can test this out on i686/gnu/linu
[please cc on reply]
Hi,
Installing the full gcc suite on a sarge box, I discover that gnats-3.n
conflicts with all the preceding version. Is there a particular reason
for that ? I didn't find the information greping the changelog.
Might be a stupid question but I know almost nothing about gnat/
severity 269087 grave
reassign 269087 gcc-3.3
close 269087
merge 269087 268338
thanks
This is the 18th duplicate of #268338. Please read the existing bug reports
before submitting new ones. FYI, this bug has been closed in 3.3.4-6sarge1.2,
which reached
testing yesterday.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 269087 grave
Bug#269087: contains files in package libstdc++5-3.3-doc
Severity set to `grave'.
> reassign 269087 gcc-3.3
Bug#269087: contains files in package libstdc++5-3.3-doc
Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++5' to `gcc-3.3'.
> close 2
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-31
06:36 ---
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg01136.html
> That was easy to find (using google).
You're the best :-) I was desperately searching my mailbox with "davis"...
Anyway, I think the patch
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-31
05:53 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg01136.html
That was easy to find (using google).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17180
--- You are receiving this mail because: --
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-31
05:47 ---
The problem was introduced/exposed by Bud's patch.
Bud, can you point at the message/discussion on gcc-patches (I failed to find
it) and/or comment upon the patch? Thanks in advance.
--
Wha
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-31
05:32 ---
> When can we expect a fix?
Hopefully today.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17180
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the repor
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-08-31 05:11
---
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] nearly all g77 tests fail
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-31
>05:00 ---
>Mark, this PR
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-31
05:00 ---
Mark, this PR is a showstopper on SPARC/Solaris 32-bit. I'm working on it and I
respectfully request you not to release 3.4.2 until after it is resolved.
Thanks.
--
What|Removed
35 matches
Mail list logo
