--
What|Removed |Added
CC||schwab at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18189
--- You are receiving this mail b
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |3.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18189
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #278388 to gcc-gnats as PR 18189
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18189
> forwarded 278388 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18189
Bug#278388: gcc-3.3: __fixunsdfdi problem on m68k
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
[snip]
> > At least so far, MIPS was careful to extend successor ISAs to a
> > proper superset of the predecessor WRT non-privileged instructions.
>
> Fine by me then. Want to run this by the MIPS maintainers upstream
> first?
I want it to go in sarge if this is still po
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
[snip]
> > > IIRC, likely branches are deprecated in the latest MIPS ISAs; we
> > > shouldn't be introducing more of them. I don't know what silicon bug
> > > you're working around, though, so I don't know if there's a better way.
> >
> > R1 before revision 2.6 fail t
Package: libstdc++6-4.0-doc
Version: 4.0-0pre0
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
Hi,
here is the problem:
mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man3/std::ofstream.3.gz: bad symlink or ROFF
`.so' request
mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man3/std::basic_ofstream.3: No such file or
directory
mandb: w
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 07:45:40PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> [snip]
> > > > IIRC, likely branches are deprecated in the latest MIPS ISAs; we
> > > > shouldn't be introducing more of them. I don't know what silicon bug
> > > > you're working around, though, so I don't
Package: gfortran-4.0
Version: 4.0-0pre0
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
Hi,
here are the 2 dangling symlinks:
mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/i386-linux-g95-4.0.1 is a dangling symlink
mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/i486-linux-g95-4.0.1 is a dangling symlink
They point to "g95-4.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 07:09:49PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> [snip]
> > > The appended patch fixes it. It also changes the branch to the likely
> > > variant, this works around some breakage in early R1 silicon.
> > > The patch is against gcc-3.3, newer gccs have
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
[snip]
> > The appended patch fixes it. It also changes the branch to the likely
> > variant, this works around some breakage in early R1 silicon.
> > The patch is against gcc-3.3, newer gccs have the same problem, but
> > have some apparently bogus changes in that area
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 04:09:15PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Package: gcc-3.3
> Version: 3.3.5-1
> Severity: important
>
> While trying to run Debian on a SGI O200 Machine I found out that the
> inline assembly to handle atomic operations in libstdc++ is broken.
> The effect is very visible: "
11 matches
Mail list logo