--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-04
01:47 ---
Actually was just the removal of the define_expand, I think, I will try that
simple patch and try to post it
soon.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19162
--- You are receiving this m
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-04
01:37 ---
Looking at the history I think this is also a 3.4 release, so maybe the problem
is using XFmode:
* arm.h (ENABLE_XF_PATTERNS): Delete.
* arm.md (addxf3, subxf3, mulxf3, divxf3, modxf3, negxf2, absxf2)
(sqrt
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Dec 31 22:11:04 UTC 2004
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/warn/Wunused-9.C (test for warnings, line 32)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/empty.C -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/empty.C -O2 -g (tes
skater is RGK in katharine of beach to k's with reeve.
carbonate am juneau going monogamous to 63159525 be rudy the butte
you can now have Softw @ re out of your p0cket m0ney:
http://hotmail.com.captive.mnlenekn.info/?nCpsVEn85ruMFTTpermute
H!t the ab0ve l!ink now
allotropic is
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:57:09AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> I just read a buildlog for gcc-3.4 and saw large amount of test failures
> but the build themself is marked as successfull. I don't think this is
> the proper use of a testsuite and have to asume that nothing in the
> package may work
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 03.01.05 10:57:34:
> I just read a buildlog for gcc-3.4 and saw large amount of test failures
> but the build themself is marked as successfull. I don't think this is
> the proper use of a testsuite and have to asume that nothing in the
> package may wo
I just read a buildlog for gcc-3.4 and saw large amount of test failures
but the build themself is marked as successfull. I don't think this is
the proper use of a testsuite and have to asume that nothing in the
package may work.
Bastian
--
It is more rational to sacrifice one life than six.
7 matches
Mail list logo
