They cheat

2005-01-06 Thread Mrs . Caleb
Note: website may contain adult pictures, if you are under 18, please leave Site Membership is only $1 Cheating_House_Wife _Services Nick Name: Katherine26 Age: 26 Measurement: 36 28 36 Status: Married, but looking Fantasy: Do some filthy things with an attractive man, not knowing his name. Favorit

debian

2005-01-06 Thread Dame Yan
Can you give me a source code of this problem   IT131 Tue/Fri 7:30-9:30 amComputer Virus Simulation (70 points)A computer virus is a portion of computer code designed to insert an existing computer program,alter or destroy data, and copy itself into other programs in the same computer or into progr

Bug#289045: gcc-3.3: gcc packages do not use the alternative system

2005-01-06 Thread Falk Hueffner
severity 289045 wishlist thanks Attila Kinali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 06.01.05 23:23:30: > Package: gcc-3.3 > Version: 1:3.3.5-5 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks unrelated software > > It is possible to have various versions of gcc&co installed, > though no

Processed: Re: Bug#289045: gcc-3.3: gcc packages do not use the alternative system

2005-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 289045 wishlist Bug#289045: gcc-3.3: gcc packages do not use the alternative system Severity set to `wishlist'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administra

Bug#289045: gcc-3.3: gcc packages do not use the alternative system

2005-01-06 Thread Attila Kinali
Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.5-5 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software It is possible to have various versions of gcc&co installed, though none of the packages use the alternative system but a couple of unrelated symlinks in /usr/bin. Thus, these symlinks get overwritten

Bug#224735: marked as done (libstdc++5-3.3-dev: Leaks in string allocation?)

2005-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:58:41 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line libstdc++5-3.3-dev: Leaks in string allocation? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#277206: gcc-3.3: internal error (segfault) while compiling Linux 2.6.9

2005-01-06 Thread Falk Hueffner
Hi, can you still reproduce this? If so, can you provide the preprocessed source, as generated when adding -save-temps to the flags? Falk

Bug#289002: marked as done (gcc-3.3: assignment of 64-bit constant (0x100000000) to unsigned long always fails)

2005-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:48:06 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#289002: gcc-3.3: assignment of 64-bit constant (0x1) to unsigned long always fails has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Processed: tag 242916

2005-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 242916 + fixed-upstream Bug#242916: gcc-3.3: GCC 3.3 crashes when assembling ARM Linux 2.6.5 kernel There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-upstream > retitle 242916 [fixed in 3.4] ICE on invalid #define with -traditional Bug#242916: gcc-3.3: G

Bug#289002: gcc-3.3: assignment of 64-bit constant (0x100000000) to unsigned long always fails

2005-01-06 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 07:31:59PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote: > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb > am 06.01.05 19:10:48: > > > math ops - >> and & - cannot be performed with constants > 32-bit! > > I don't see that. > > > #define TEST 0x1 > >

Bug#288721:

2005-01-06 Thread Falk Hueffner
# submitted Debian report #288721 to gcc-gnats as PR 19296 # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19296 forwarded 288721 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19296 retitle 288721 [PR 19296] [3.3 regression] Range check on short miscompiled at -O tags 288721 + upstream thanks

Processed:

2005-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # submitted Debian report #288721 to gcc-gnats as PR 19296 > # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19296 > forwarded 288721 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19296 Bug#288721: gcc-3.3: gcc produces wrong code with -O1 or -O2 for very simple C program (included) Noted your stateme

Bug#270336:

2005-01-06 Thread Falk Hueffner
reassign 270336 vbox3 thanks This is not a gcc bug; the code violates C's aliasing rules, as can be seen when using -Wall: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/vbox3-0.1.9.2/vboxgetty% gcc-3.4 -W -Wall -DSYSCONFDIR=/usr/../etc/isdn/vbox -DPKGDATADIR=/usr/share/isdn/vbox -DLOGDIR=/var/log -DLOCKDIR=/var/lock

Processed:

2005-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 270336 vbox3 Bug#270336: gcc: -O2 overly aggessive Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `vbox3'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bug

Bug#289002: gcc-3.3: assignment of 64-bit constant (0x100000000) to unsigned long always fails

2005-01-06 Thread Falk Hueffner
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 06.01.05 19:10:48: > math ops - >> and & - cannot be performed with constants > 32-bit! I don't see that. > #define TEST 0x1 > > unsigned long test = (TEST >> 32); > > gives a compile error! It doesn't fo

Bug#289002: gcc-3.3: assignment of 64-bit constant (0x100000000) to unsigned long always fails

2005-01-06 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.4-11 Severity: normal -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux highfield 2.6.9-1-686 #1 Thu Nov 25 03:48:29 EST 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C math ops - >> and & - cannot be performed with constants > 32-bit