Results for 4.0.0 20050110 (experimental) testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

2005-01-14 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jan 11 00:09:12 UTC 2005 === acats tests === FAIL: a26007a FAIL: ad8011a FAIL: c23003a FAIL: c23003b FAIL: c23003g FAIL: c23003i FAIL: c32001e FAIL: c330001 FAIL: c35502d FAIL: c35502f FAIL: c35503d FAIL: c35503f FAIL: c43214c FAIL: c45

[Bug target/18987] [3.3/3.4 regression] [ia64] Extra '.restore sp' in tail call

2005-01-14 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-14 19:52 --- Fixed on mainline, gcc-3.4 branch, and gcc-3.3 branch. Testcase added to mainline. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/18987] [3.3/3.4 regression] [ia64] Extra '.restore sp' in tail call

2005-01-14 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 18987 depends on bug 13158, which changed state. Bug 13158 Summary: [ia64] bad unwind info as a result of sibcall http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13158 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug target/18987] [3.3/3.4 regression] [ia64] Extra '.restore sp' in tail call

2005-01-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-14 19:45 --- Subject: Bug 18987 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-14 19:45:23 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/t

[Bug target/18987] [3.3/3.4 regression] [ia64] Extra '.restore sp' in tail call

2005-01-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-14 19:15 --- Subject: Bug 18987 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_3-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-14 19:15:41 Modified files: gcc: Change

Bug#254626: Problem still seen on gcc 3.4.3

2005-01-14 Thread Falk Hueffner
Martin Habets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 14.01.05 18:24:52: > I've been retesting this problem using the packages below, > and the problem is still there. The assembler code generated > looks exactly the same as before. Please provide the preprocessed source as obtained wh

Bug#254626: Problem still seen on gcc 3.4.3

2005-01-14 Thread Martin Habets
I've been retesting this problem using the packages below, and the problem is still there. The assembler code generated looks exactly the same as before. ii gcc-3.43.4.3-6The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.4-base 3.4.3-6The GNU Compiler Collection (base package) -- Martin

Processed: retitle 290438

2005-01-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package g77-3.3 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: g77-3.3 > retitle 290438 g77-3.3: produces wrong code on i386 compiling with > -fno-automatic -O1 Bug#290438: produces wrong code on i386 compiling with -fno-automatic -O1 Changed Bug title. > thanks Sto

Bug#290483: gij-3.4 suggests libgcj-awt5 but not found. Should be libgcj5-awt?

2005-01-14 Thread Egon Willighagen
Package: gij-3.4 Severity: normal gij-3.4 suggests libgcj-awt5 but not found. Should be libgcj5-awt? -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-9-amd64-k8-smp Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to