Re: [patch] m68k extendqidi2 fix

2005-03-02 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 10:42:54AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Richard Zidlicky writes: > > Hi, > > > > the problem has been already discussed some time > > ago "upstream", now ocatve triggered the bug so > > it seems the fix should be backported to 3.3 > > > > octave problem > > http://list

Re: [patch] m68k extendqidi2 fix

2005-03-02 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 11:16:35AM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-02 10:42]: > > > I'm applying the patch for 3.4 now, debian-m68k, should the patch > > applied without testing to 3.3 as well? > > I think you should apply the patch, because the b

Re: [patch] m68k extendqidi2 fix

2005-03-02 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-02 10:42]: > I'm applying the patch for 3.4 now, debian-m68k, should the patch > applied without testing to 3.3 as well? I think you should apply the patch, because the build daemons use gcc 3.3 for building the packages. I can provide an indirect t

Processed: Re: Bug#165635: [Bug java/8608] segmentation fault on compiling bad program

2005-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 165635 + fixed-upstream Bug#165635: [PR java/8608] segmentation fault on compiling bad program Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream > retitle 165635 [fixed in 4.1] [PR java/8608] segmentation fault on compiling > bad program Bug#165635:

Re: [patch] m68k extendqidi2 fix

2005-03-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Richard Zidlicky writes: > Hi, > > the problem has been already discussed some time > ago "upstream", now ocatve triggered the bug so > it seems the fix should be backported to 3.3 > > octave problem > http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2005/02/msg00049.html that message has another (.extbf) p