Bug#301140: acknowledged by developer (Re: Processed: Re: Bug#301140: libstdc++6-4.0-doc: dpkg fails to manage this package : filenames too long (on my box at least))

> The "File name too long" is an error returned by the rename() call, > specifically ENAMETOOLONG. > > This filename is too long for your filesystem. I don't think dpkg > should randomly truncate or alter filenames, therefore there's nothing > dpkg can do here other than abort the installation.

breakthrough discovery in Cholesterol control - bilingual

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: March 23, 2005. Associates News Flozar Heart Health News: Breakthrough Natural Cholesterol Reduction System: 60% of people are at risk. are YOU? No Dangerous side effects such as dizziness, nausea, yellow skin & more. http://healthwatch.anationpickle.com/2fl2/ Try Flo

gcc-defaults_1.20_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: chill_2.95.4-35_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-35_i386.deb cpp-doc_3.3.5-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp-doc_3.3.5-2_i386.deb cpp_3.3.5-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_3.3.5-2_i386.deb g++_3.3.5-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_3

Bug#278105: marked as done (gcc-defaults: Make a libgcj-dev defaults package)

Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:33:01 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#278105: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.20 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#300583: marked as done (/usr/bin/gij-wrapper-3.0: Running /etc/alternatives/java with no arguments segfaults.)

Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:21:19 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#300583: /usr/bin/gij-wrapper-3.0: Running /etc/alternatives/java with no arguments segfaults. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#300453: marked as done (gcj-4.0: internal compiler error if constructor name is wrong)

Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:22:36 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#300453: gcj-4.0: internal compiler error if constructor name is wrong has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#301208: gcc-4.0: FTBFS (ppc64): Please add support for the ppc64 architecture

On 05-Mar-25 21:07, Matthias Klose wrote: > > - Add libc6-dev-powerpc [ppc64] to the Build-Depends. > > - Change the Description for lib32gcc1: s/ia32/32 bit Version/ > > - Change the Depends for lib32gcc1 from 'ia32-libs' to > > '${shlibs:Depends}'. > > - Remove "Replaces: ia32-libs.openo

Processed: Re: [Bug c++/11624] -Wnon-virtual-dtor doesn't always work

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 212260 + fixed-upstream Bug#212260: [PR 13518] "virtual functions but non-virtual destructor" warning incomplete Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream > retitle 212260 [fixed in 4.0] [PR 13518] "virtual functions but non-virtual > destr

Bug#301159: marked as done (g++-3.4: gcc/g++ should use an alternative to select the version to use)

Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:10:42 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#301159: g++-3.4: gcc/g++ should use an alternative to select the version to use has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

gcc-defaults_1.20_i386.changes is NEW

chill_2.95.4-35_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-35_i386.deb cpp-doc_3.3.5-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp-doc_3.3.5-2_i386.deb cpp_3.3.5-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_3.3.5-2_i386.deb g++_3.3.5-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_3.3.5-2_i386

Bug#301064: gcc-3.4: FTBFS on hurd-i386: Missing headers

sorry, don't know anything about the status on the Hurd, CCing debian-hurd. Michael Banck writes: > Package: gcc-3.4 > Severity: important > > Hello, > > Your package failed to build on hurd-i386: > > > Automatic build of gcc-3.4_3.4.3-12 on beethoven by sbuild/hurd-i386 1.170.5 > > Build start

Bug#301208: gcc-4.0: FTBFS (ppc64): Please add support for the ppc64 architecture

thanks! Andreas Jochens writes: > * debian/control.m4 > - Add libc6-dev-powerpc [ppc64] to the Build-Depends. > - Change the Description for lib32gcc1: s/ia32/32 bit Version/ > - Change the Depends for lib32gcc1 from 'ia32-libs' to '${shlibs:Depends}'. > - Remove "Replaces: ia32-libs.openo

Processing of gcc-defaults_1.20_i386.changes

gcc-defaults_1.20_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-defaults_1.20.dsc gcc-defaults_1.20.tar.gz cpp_3.3.5-2_i386.deb cpp-doc_3.3.5-2_i386.deb gcc_3.3.5-2_i386.deb gcc-doc_3.3.5-2_i386.deb g++_3.3.5-2_i386.deb gobjc_3.3.5-2_i386.deb g77_3.3.5-

Bug#301401: libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1: packaged is needed for Sun JDK 1.3

Package: libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1 Version: 2.91.66-4 Severity: important I'm not sure if filing a bug report is the right way to go handle this... This library is needed by Sun's JDK 1.3.1, but the package does not exist in the testing or unstable distributions. Can it be added? -- System Informa

Bug#278105: gcc-defaults: Patch to create a 'libgcj-dev' package

tags 278105 + patch thanks The attached patch implements the addtion of a new 'libgcj-dev' package to gcc-defaults. Please look at Bug#300353 as an example of the problems which occur because a 'libgcj-dev' package is missing. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gcc-defaults-1.19/debi

Processed: gcc-defaults: Patch to create a 'libgcj-dev' package

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 278105 + patch Bug#278105: gcc-defaults: Make a libgcj-dev defaults package There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administ

Encrypted Pharm Web store

Important Information: Since 1924 our Official Swiss Pharm. has been the most trusted pharm. in the world, year after year. Unlike others, we allow you to order at your discretion, without any questions and with the Iron Clad Swiss Privacy Act assuring your order will be secure, delivered and

Processed: reopen 301140

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 301140 Bug#301140: libstdc++6-4.0-doc: dpkg fails to manage this package : filenames too long (on my box at least) Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug t