Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:16:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Please make libstdc++6-dev standard and libstdc++5-3.3-dev
optional
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.3 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23417
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-12 20:51
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-12
20:48 ---
: Search converges between 2004-08-05-trunk (#505) and 2004-08-06-trunk (#506).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22551
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-12
20:33 ---
Subject: Bug 23417
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-12 20:32:54
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog
libstdc++-v3/inclu
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 22:24 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On arm only, gcc cannot handle C identifiers like:
> >
> > static void L1__GET_$ENVIRONMENT__defmacro()
>
> please could you (or somebody having access to an arm machine) check,
> if the problem exists in gcc-3.4 and/or gcc-snapshot as
> On arm only, gcc cannot handle C identifiers like:
>
> static void L1__GET_$ENVIRONMENT__defmacro()
please could you (or somebody having access to an arm machine) check,
if the problem exists in gcc-3.4 and/or gcc-snapshot as well?
if these fail as well, is it possible to build the package usi
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-12
20:09 ---
Subject: Bug 23417
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-12 20:09:18
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : Change
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-12 20:05
---
Yep. Sorry. I fixed that bit too.
-benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23417
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-09-12 19:59
---
Benjamin, can you also check, say, std::set? After all the PR is about
stl_tree.h... ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23417
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported th
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-12
19:55 ---
Subject: Bug 23417
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-12 19:54:56
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-12
19:48 ---
Subject: Bug 23417
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-12 19:48:05
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog
libstdc++-v3/inclu
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-12 19:20
---
Reproducer, compile with -Weffc++.
#include
std::list l;
...fixing
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-12
19:05 ---
Confirmed but works with "4.0.0 20050225".
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFI
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 325131 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23837
Bug#325131: gcc-4.0: regression on hppa and arm, possibly wrong code
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23837.
> retitle 325131 [PR 23837] Wrong code with -fschedule-insn
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 07:05:38PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> tags 309210 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> how can this problem be reproduced? Can you make a stand-alone
> testcase?
So far I have gathered the following info:
This bug only affect gcc 4.0 build with configure --host=linux-i486.
It no mo
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 03:49:26PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
>
> Max Vozeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 12.09.05
> 13:48:41:
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:29:38PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
> > > I've been able to find a reduced testcase that shows the problem.
> > > can
Max Vozeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 12.09.05 13:48:41:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:29:38PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
> > I've been able to find a reduced testcase that shows the problem.
> > can find below the results using gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.0 with -O1/-O2 each.
> > The
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:29:38PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
> I've been able to find a reduced testcase that shows the problem.
> can find below the results using gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.0 with -O1/-O2 each.
> The problem only shows with gcc-4.0 and -O2 on hppa.
In case this helps analyze the problem,
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 02:15:11PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 01:27:43PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > Max Vozeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I can reproduce the problem in paer's sid chroot (hppa) and have put
> > > gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.0 builds with -save-temps
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 327229 important
Bug#327229: gcc-4.0: hppa: causes build failure with -O2
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 327229 + upstream
Bug#327229: gcc-4.0: hppa: causes build failure with -O2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> tags 32722
severity 327229 important
tags 327229 + upstream
tags 327229 + fixed-upstream
thanks
current workaround is to lower the optimization level to -O1, works
with current gcc-snapshot.
Gerrit Pape writes:
> Package: gcc-4.0
> Version: 4.0.1-6
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi, looks like Debian's gcc-4.0 4.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 322723 important
Bug#322723: 'ip route' kernel problem w/ gcc-4.0
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
severity 322723 important
thanks
there's a workaround, and gcc-3.4 is known to work as well. Is there
any reason to use gcc-4.0 for kernel builds on all architectures?
Frans Pop writes:
> I've reassigned this bug from the kernel to gcc-4.0 as we feel that the
> solution chosen in the kernel pac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 327780 binutils
Bug#327780: current gcc-4.0 is utterly useless on m68k
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0' to `binutils'.
> found 327780 2.16.1cvs20050902-1
Bug#327780: current gcc-4.0 is utterly useless on m68k
Bug marked as found in versio
reassign 327780 binutils
found 327780 2.16.1cvs20050902-1
thanks
Sorry, I was a bit too hasty.
Current gcc is quite some time in the archive already, so it's unlikely
it's at fault. Binutils, OTOH, has seen a recent upload. Downgrading it
to the previous version indeed fixes the segfault issues.
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-6
Severity: important
Hi,
gcc-4.0 ICEs on m68k while trying to build flac 1.1.2-3.
As excerpted from
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=flac&ver=1.1.2-3&arch=m68k&stamp=1125138508&file=log&as=raw
:
make[5]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/flac-1.1.2/src/l
27 matches
Mail list logo
