Hi Matthias,
Il giorno ven, 02/09/2005 alle 12.29 +0200, Matthias Klose ha scritto:
[...]
> > > forwarded 324502 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23503
> > Bug#324502: libgcj6-awt: [GtkImage] assertion failed in compiled code
> > Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
> >
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-16
02:16 ---
Unassigning for now.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-16
01:54 ---
Subject: Bug 23896
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-16 01:53:43
Modified files:
gcc/cp : Change
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-16
01:54 ---
Fixed in 4.0.2.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESO
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-16
01:51 ---
Subject: Bug 23896
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-16 01:50:26
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog pt.c
gcc/testsuite
Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 23:56:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324228: libg2c0-dev: conflict with g77-2.95
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 324228 +wontfix
Bug#324228: libg2c0-dev: conflict with g77-2.95
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 10:36:04PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> please could you send an updated patch? IIUC, then the patch has to be
> updated.
OK, new patch attached.
Cheers,
Olly
--- gij-wrapper-3.4-old 2005-09-15 22:19:07.772964328 +0100
+++ gij-wrapper-3.4 2005-09-15 22:18:48.3539
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 322170 4.0.1-7
Bug#322170: [PR 23417] libstdc++6: bits/stl_tree.h isn't -Weffc++ clean
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 4.0.1-7, send any further explanations to Marc
Mutz <[E
Greetings! 3.4 too -- am backing off to 3.3 on arm now...
Take care,
Phil Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 22:24 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > On arm only, gcc cannot handle C identifiers like:
> > >
> > > static void L1__GET_$ENVIRONMENT__defmacro()
> >
> > pl
close 322170 4.0.1-7
thanks
fixed in 4.0.1-7
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
18:05 ---
Darn, I should never have fixed that original PR. Silly me, trying to fix bugs.
Mine.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-09-15 17:56
---
This is what I come up with:
---
template struct X {};
template struct length {
static const int value = 2;
};
template void foo () {
sizeof(X::value>);
}
template void fo
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
16:22 ---
Reduced as far as I could do:
namespace boost{
template struct STATIC_ASSERTION_FAILURE {};
struct null_type;
template
class tuple;
template struct cons {
typedef TT tail_type;
};
templat
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-6
Severity: normal
Hello,
Many thanks for packaging gcc!
I found a scenario in which code built with libstdc++5 interacts badly
with code built with libstdc++6, regardless of versioned symbols.
This thread in debian-devel carries the full analysis:
http://list
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 328396 glibc
Bug#328396: pthread_rwlock_wrlock() hangs even after all locks should be
unlocked!
Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++6 glibc' to `glibc'.
> tags 328396 + moreinfo
Bug#328396: pthread_rwlock_wrlock() hangs even after all locks
16 matches
Mail list logo
