--- Comment #9 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-10-07 05:43 ---
Fixed on 4.0 branch.
--
uros at kss-loka dot si changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-07 05:32
---
Subject: Bug 22585
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-07 05:32:37
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.5 |3.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18823
--- You are
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.5 |3.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16676
--- You are
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.5 |3.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13000
--- You are
Accepted:
cpp-4.0_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb
fastjar_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb
fixincludes_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fixincludes_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb
g++-4.0_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/g++-4
gcc-4.0_4.0.2-2_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb
libgcc2_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb
cpp-4.0_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb
protoize_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb
fixincludes_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb
libmudflap0_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb
libmudflap0-dev_4.0.2-2_m68k.deb
Accepted:
chill_2.95.4-44_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-44_i386.deb
cpp-doc_4.0.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp-doc_4.0.2-1_i386.deb
cpp_4.0.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.0.2-1_i386.deb
g++_4.0.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_4
gcc-defaults_1.29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-defaults_1.29.dsc
gcc-defaults_1.29.tar.gz
cpp_4.0.2-1_i386.deb
cpp-doc_4.0.2-1_i386.deb
gcc_4.0.2-1_i386.deb
gcc-doc_4.0.2-1_i386.deb
g++_4.0.2-1_i386.deb
gobjc_4.0.2-1_i386.deb
g77_3.4.4-
Matthias Klose wrote:
> If
> you think, that availability of compilers on some architectures
> should be release criterium, please bring that up with the release
> team first.
That's not at all what I think.
I think that if there are known binutils bugs for your architecture, which
supposedly pr
Nathanael Nerode writes:
> Nathanael Nerode writes:
> > This is no way to get a bug fixed. If this is seriously the level of
> > attention to mips and mipsel, Debian support for them should be dropped.
>
> Matthias Klose wrote:
> >sorry, this attitude has nothing to do with release management, i
Nathanael Nerode writes:
> This is no way to get a bug fixed. If this is seriously the level of
> attention to mips and mipsel, Debian support for them should be dropped.
Matthias Klose wrote:
>sorry, this attitude has nothing to do with release management, it's
>just ranting.
>The problem is a
Xavier Grave writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have build the gcc 4.0 package on powerpc architecture (power5 based
> system), but there isn't any lib64gnat-4.0 produced, how can I try to
> produce one ?
AFAIK, Ada is not prepared for biarch builds. Maybe the easiest way
would be to build a 64bit ada in a sec
Nathanael Nerode writes:
> This is no way to get a bug fixed. If this is seriously the level of
> attention to mips and mipsel, Debian support for them should be dropped.
sorry, this attitude has nothing to do with release management, it's
just ranting. The problem is addressed, known to the ri
--- Comment #3 from janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2005-10-06 22:21 ---
The list of work/fail versions is very odd for this bug; it seems to have
worked on mainline until sometime between 20050828 and 20050904. 3.3.5 passes,
but all 3.4.x versions I tried fail. 4.0.0 passes but 4.0.2 f
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>The toolchain (more specifically: ld) can't handle the gcj runtime
>build yet. Btw, ghc triggers the same problem, there were several
>reports filed for the various instances of this bug.
Ah, I see. So it's binutils which can't handle it. No wonder I couldn't find
any bug re
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
Version: 1.0.30-4
Severity: wishlist
Hi Matthias,
I tested tomcat5 with java-gcj-compat-dev and it works with one
workaround.
tomcat5 checks for JDK functionality by precense of the jdb tool.
It's sufficient for startup if it is linked to /bin/true. However
I would r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 330741 + upstream
Bug#330741: gcj-4.0: ICE in first_insn_after_basic_block_note on HPPA
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> forwarded 330741 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24221
Bug#330741: gcj-4.0: ICE in first_insn_after_basic_block_note on HPP
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> I notice that GCJ (& company) are not built on mips or mipsel.
> What I can't figure out is why.
>
> GCJ is supported for mips*-*-linux* (except for mips64*-*-linux*, which
> is not supported) upstream in the 4.0 series, and I couldn't find any
> reported bugs on problems
19 matches
Mail list logo