--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 04:42
---
Fixed on the mainline and the 4.0 branch for 4.0.3 but is waiting for a back
port for 3.4.x.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #15 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 02:12 ---
Subject: Bug 24202
Author: wilson
Date: Fri Nov 4 02:12:48 2005
New Revision: 106473
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106473
Log:
Fix pragma once bug where buffer is NULL and buffer_valid is t
--- Comment #14 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 02:10 ---
Subject: Bug 24202
Author: wilson
Date: Fri Nov 4 02:10:19 2005
New Revision: 106472
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106472
Log:
Fix failure with pragma once where buffer is NULL and buffer_v
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
The sentinel attribute tells GCC to ensure that the argument list of a
variadic function always ends with a final NULL argument. It should be
possible to use this attribute for a variadic function where the
sentinel is some const
--- Comment #7 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 21:00 ---
Jakub, ping!
What's up with this one?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--- Comment #3 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 20:35
---
Forgot to add where it bombs w/o gdb involved:
antlr/Parser.java: In class 'antlr.Parser':
antlr/Parser.java: In method 'antlr.Parser.consumeUntil(int)':
antlr/Parser.java:0: internal compiler error: Bus error
Ple
strip antlr.so -g -O2 -version
-fclasspath= -fassume-compiled -o /var/tmp//cchNKeYh.s
Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
GNU Java version 4.0.3 20051103 (prerelease) (powerpc-apple-darwin8.3.0)
compiled by GNU C version 4.0.3 20051103 (prerelease).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expan
please could you (or Phil) take this upstream directly and link the
upstream and Debian reports? I currently do not have any access to arm
hardware (and hardly the time to do anything with it). We are
currently considering disabling the java support for m68k on request
by one of the m68k porters, s
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Akim Demaille
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: Multiple static inline functions accepted
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: c
>Class: accepts-illegal
>Release: 4.0.2 (Debian 4.0.2-2) (Debian testing/
Package: gij-4.0
Version: 4.0.2-2
Severity: important
On armeb (and the same thing appears to be happening on regular arm),
gij doesn't seem to work at all -- trying to run any .class file just
results in a interpreter segfault accessing memory location ,
which is caught and reported as a
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 14:25 ---
*** Bug 24652 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 02:01:18PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 01:28:57PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > tags 336167 +patch
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > > > > The appended patch reverts a single line of the diff be
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 01:28:57PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > tags 336167 +patch
> > thanks
> >
> > Sven Luther wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > > The appended patch reverts a single line of the diff between 4.0.2-2
> > > > and 4.0.2-3 and lets the testcase succeed. I don't know t
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 01:28:57PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> tags 336167 +patch
> thanks
>
> Sven Luther wrote:
> [snip]
> > > The appended patch reverts a single line of the diff between 4.0.2-2
> > > and 4.0.2-3 and lets the testcase succeed. I don't know that part of
> > > gcc enough to jud
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 336167 +patch
Bug#336167: gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
tags 336167 +patch
thanks
Sven Luther wrote:
[snip]
> > The appended patch reverts a single line of the diff between 4.0.2-2
> > and 4.0.2-3 and lets the testcase succeed. I don't know that part of
> > gcc enough to judge if it is a valid fix for the problem.
> >
> > Sven, could you test if this
--- Comment #14 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 11:29
---
Since Mark's patch for PR19253
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg00141.html
this is an error again.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Adde
--- Comment #1 from mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 09:41 ---
Confirmed, this prevents gjdoc from building, which used the build just fine
with earlier gcj 4.0.x releases.
--
mark at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #86 from bero at arklinux dot org 2005-11-03 09:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=10120)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10120&action=view)
Updated version of the patch to apply on current SVN
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664
-
19 matches
Mail list logo
