Debian Bug Tracking System writes:
> Package: gij-4.0
> Version: 4.0.2-3
>
> I've confirmed that this bug is fixed in or before gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3.
strange. what you did check for?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Nov 11 23:10:32 UTC 2005 (revision 106803)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c954026
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2319
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Nov 11 23:10:32 UTC 2005 (revision 106803)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: a85013b
FAIL: a87b59a
FAIL: a95074d
FAIL: ad7201a
FAIL: c37402a
FAIL: c37403a
FAIL: c38102d
FAIL: c38202a
FAIL: c39008a
FAIL: c39008b
FAIL: c39008c
FAIL: c41306a
FAIL: c
Hi!
I've got interested in the D language since the C++ language is
becoming worse and worse in front of the C# and Java ones. But C++ is
the only C-style syntax language that doesn't have to run above a
virtual machine.
Here is a good quote about it:
"It seems to me that most of the "new" progra
Nathanael Nerode writes:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
> > about 150. attached is a list of source packages, which either define
> > mt_alloc symbols or reference them. libraries depending on kdelibs do
> > not have to be renamed (about 30/40).
> Um, out of curiosity, why don't they? They didn't need to
Matthias Klose wrote:
> about 150. attached is a list of source packages, which either define
> mt_alloc symbols or reference them. libraries depending on kdelibs do
> not have to be renamed (about 30/40).
Um, out of curiosity, why don't they? They didn't need to be renamed
for 'c2' because KDE ha
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC target triplet|powerpc-*-*,s390-*-*, mips- |powerpc-*-*,s390-*-*, mips-
|*-*, mips64-*-*
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.1 regression] ICE in |[4.1 regression] Ada ICE
|get_base_var|d
--- Comment #25 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-11-12 16:51 ---
*** Bug 24821 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22533
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are wat
--- Comment #1 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-11-12 16:51 ---
Likely to be the same problem than mips/powerpc. Note there's a negatively
reviewed patch that solves this problem.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22533 ***
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
Dear Sir/ Madam
Iam an agent AT THE INSPIRE CASTING AND MODELLING
Angecy, which is in Maseru Lesotho.
Being a mosotho boy aged 19 and an agent in that
agency, i wish to ask that if your compony might need
to put on Billboards in Lesotho, we are ready and
willing to do bussiness with you.
Thank
--- Comment #16 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-11-12 16:11 ---
Arnaud has a patch for this issue on trunk and a better workaround patch for
4.0.
Could you post your stage3 failure?
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 12:30:43PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> with these news, i need to understand how boost debian package needs
> to move.
> currently unstable has boost 1.33.0, which would be ready for testing if
> it did not depend on gcc >= 4.0.2-3. my understanding is that gcc-4.0,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 336114 + pending
Bug#336114: gcc-4.0_4.0.1-9 backwards incompatible changes
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
14 matches
Mail list logo
