Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

2006-03-04 Thread Falk Hueffner
Chris Howie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Falk Hueffner wrote: >> the fact that your program crashes in glibc memory manangement makes >> it quite unlikely that this is a compiler bug. Can you try valgrind? >> Also, your test case is quite large, would it be possible to get >> something smaller? >

[Bug c++/6634] wrong parsing of "long long double"

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-12-07 04:47:52 |2006-03-05 03:36:17 date||

Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

2006-03-04 Thread Chris Howie
Falk Hueffner wrote: > the fact that your program crashes in glibc memory manangement makes > it quite unlikely that this is a compiler bug. Can you try valgrind? I can see why you would think that now. Let me explain why the free() call is segfaulting: #0 0xb7e6bab9 in free () from /lib/tls/li

Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

2006-03-04 Thread Chris Howie
Falk Hueffner wrote: > the fact that your program crashes in glibc memory manangement makes > it quite unlikely that this is a compiler bug. Can you try valgrind? > Also, your test case is quite large, would it be possible to get > something smaller? Then why does it work find with -finline-functi

gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.changes ACCEPTED

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb fastjar_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fastjar_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb fixincludes_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fixincludes_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb g++-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb to pool/main/g

Processed: Re: Bug#338501: [i386] gcc produces code that sigill on K6

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 338501 Bug#338501: [i386] gcc produces code that sigill on K6 Bug reopened, originator not changed. > reassign 338501 octave Bug#338501: [i386] gcc produces code that sigill on K6 Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0' to `octave'. > thanks Stop

Bug#338501: [i386] gcc produces code that sigill on K6

2006-03-04 Thread Falk Hueffner
reopen 338501 reassign 338501 octave thanks Timo Juhani Lindfors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just did apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade and octave seems > to still die with illegal instruction > > so shouldn't but 338501 be reopened and assigned back to octave? Oh, right. Let's do it.

Re: GCC 4.1 in experimental / GCC for etch

2006-03-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-04 00:43]: > I'm going to build 4.1.0-0 now. Both uploaded, logs available at http://people.debian.org/~tbm/logs/gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0/ Matthias and Thiemo, can you look at the results from the test suite? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ --

Processing of gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.changes

2006-03-04 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.1-base_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb libgcc1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb cpp-4.1_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb protoize_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb fixincludes_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb libmudflap0_4.1.0-0_mipsel.deb libmudflap0-dev_4.1.0

gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.changes ACCEPTED

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb fastjar_4.1.0-0_mips.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fastjar_4.1.0-0_mips.deb fixincludes_4.1.0-0_mips.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fixincludes_4.1.0-0_mips.deb g++-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/g++-4

[Bug rtl-optimization/14261] ICE due to if-conversion

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-04 19:49 --- *** Bug 26555 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/26555] unrecognizable insn on IA64

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-04 19:49 --- Actually looking at the ICE which is produce by the testcase in PR 14261, I see this is an exact dup. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 14261 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug target/26562] [3.4/4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn with huge symbol offset with -fPIC

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|4.0.2 4.0.3 |4.0.2 4.0.3 3.4.3 Known to work|4.1.0 4.2.0 |4.1

[Bug target/26562] [4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn with huge symbol offset with -fPIC

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-04 19:44 --- Still fails as of today. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known

[Bug target/26562] [4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn with huge symbol offset with -fPIC

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-04 19:37 --- Confirmed, still fails as of 20060225. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/26562] [4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn with huge symbol offset with -fPIC

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-04 19:36 --- It still fails as of 20051209. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26562 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Processing of gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.changes

2006-03-04 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.1-base_4.1.0-0_mips.deb libgcc1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb cpp-4.1_4.1.0-0_mips.deb protoize_4.1.0-0_mips.deb fixincludes_4.1.0-0_mips.deb libmudflap0_4.1.0-0_mips.deb libmudflap0-dev_4.1.0-0_mips.deb

[Bug target/26562] [4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn with huge symbol offset with -fPIC

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-04 19:31 --- And that was PR 24683. Isn't this fixed in 4.0.3? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/26562] [4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn with huge symbol offset with -fPIC

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.0 Regression]|[4.0 Regression] |unrecognizable insn with|unre

[Bug target/26562] [4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn with huge symbol offset

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-04 19:23 --- I thought I saw a related bug to this before. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/26560] mips: unable to find a register to spill in class 'FP_REGS'

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #10968|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| http://

Bug#338501: marked as done ([i386] gcc produces code that sigill on K6)

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Mar 2006 19:39:26 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338501: [i386] gcc produces code that sigill on K6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

[Bug target/26560] mips: unable to find a register to spill in class 'FP_REGS'

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26560

gcc-4.0_4.0.2-10_multi.changes ACCEPTED

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-10_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-10_all.deb cpp-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-10_i386.deb cpp-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-10_powerpc.deb fastjar_4.0.2-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gc

Processing of gcc-4.0_4.0.2-10_multi.changes

2006-03-04 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-4.0_4.0.2-10_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.0-doc_4.0.2-10_all.deb gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-10_i386.deb lib64objc1_4.0.2-10_i386.deb libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-10_i386.deb libstdc++6-4.0-dbg_4.0.2-10_i386.deb libgcc1_4.0.2-10_i386.deb cpp-4.0_

Processed: Bug#323016: [m68k] while compiling tin

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 323016 + moreinfo Bug#323016: [m68k] while compiling tin There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bu

Bug#323016: [m68k] while compiling tin

2006-03-04 Thread Falk Hueffner
tags 323016 + moreinfo thanks Both tin and sharutils seem to build now on m68k. Is this fixed? Otherwise, is there a test case? -- Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#343898: fix for unreadable error messages in g++ when #define'ing min or max

2006-03-04 Thread Falk Hueffner
Hi, the standard says: A translation unit that includes a header shall not contain any macros that define names declared or defined in that header. So it's not generally disallowed to #define min/max, but rather there should be only exactly two places checking for this, namely and . The err

[Bug c++/26559] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with __builtin_constant_p in template argument

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-04 16:19 --- Confirmed. Backtrace: htab_find_with_hash (htab=0x0, element=0x2b15a320, hash=1432532068) at /home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/libiberty/hashtab.c:269 269 const struct prime_ent *p = &prime_tab[htab->size

[Bug c++/26558] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] segfault on syntax error

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-04 16:01 --- Actually it fails with checking since 3.4.0 so confirmed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

Processed: gcc stuff

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 349083 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26557 Bug#349083: g++: internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26557. > tags 349083 + upstream Bug#349083: g++: intern

[Bug c++/26558] [4.2 Regression] segfault on syntax error

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug c++/26558] segfault on syntax error

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-04 15:56 --- But not with "4.2.0 20060304" on x86_64: t.cc: In member function ‘int C::fun2()’: t.cc:4: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in cp_parser_class_n

[Bug c++/26558] segfault on syntax error

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-04 15:55 --- And "4.0.3 20051105" on x86_64. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26558 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

[Bug c++/26558] segfault on syntax error

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-04 15:55 --- Hmm, works with 4.1.0 20060208 on x86_64. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26558 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To U

[Bug middle-end/26557] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-04 15:53 --- This is definitely a middle-end issue: #0 fancy_abort (file=0xce9f78 "/home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/gcc/simplify-rtx.c", line=4402, function=0xed4670 "simplify_subreg") at /home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/gcc/

[Bug middle-end/26557] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.3 4.0.2 4.1.0 4.2.0 Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/26557] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-04 15:49 --- Confirmed, a C testcase: extern const int struct_test[]; const int struct_test[] = {1}; void g(); void f() { switch(struct_test[0]) { case 1: g(); } } -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug middle-end/26557] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug middle-end/26557] ICE in simplify_subreg

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |middle-end http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26557 --

Processed: Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 347697 + moreinfo Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3 There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

2006-03-04 Thread Falk Hueffner
tags 347697 + moreinfo thanks Hi, the fact that your program crashes in glibc memory manangement makes it quite unlikely that this is a compiler bug. Can you try valgrind? Also, your test case is quite large, would it be possible to get something smaller? -- Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

[Bug target/26555] unrecognizable insn on IA64

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-04 14:57 --- I think this is a dup of bug 14261. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/23454] [4.0 regression] ICE in invert_exp_1, at jump.c:1719

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- | |patches/2005- |

[Bug rtl-optimization/23454] [4.0 regression] ICE in invert_exp_1, at jump.c:1719

2006-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23454 --- You

Processed: Bug#344041: [m68k] gcc-4.0: internal consistency failure

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 344041 + moreinfo Bug#344041: [m68k] gcc-4.0: internal consistency failure There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Processed: gcc stuff

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 343511 + upstream wontfix Bug#343511: g++-3.4 -O1: wrong code generation There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream, wontfix > forwarded 343511 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR17972 Bug#343511: g++-3.4 -O1: wrong code generation Noted your statement that B

Bug#344041: [m68k] gcc-4.0: internal consistency failure

2006-03-04 Thread Falk Hueffner
tags 344041 + moreinfo thanks Hi Stephen, in #344046, you mention upstream is working on this. Can you give more details? Is there a PR? A fix? -- Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug rtl-optimization/23454] [4.0 regression] ICE in invert_exp_1, at jump.c:1719

2006-03-04 Thread falk at debian dot org
--- Comment #9 from falk at debian dot org 2006-03-04 14:35 --- Is this really fixed? I can still reproduce it with the original testcase (but not the reduced one) with g++ (GCC) 4.0.3 20060212 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-9) -- falk at debian dot org changed: What|Remo

Re: GCC 4.1 in experimental / GCC for etch

2006-03-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Matthias Klose wrote: > The GCC (GNU compiler collection) 4.1 release candidate 1 can be found > in experimental. "Porters", please make sure that the package is > built and uploaded (if it's not built by the experimental > buildd). Please check that the symbols exported in the 4.1 libraries > ar

Bug#339495: cpp-4.0-doc: cpp support "-O" option but not documented

2006-03-04 Thread Falk Hueffner
Hi, I don't think these options are meaningful or should be documented. Why would you want to use them? -- Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Bug#334339: mysql-client: Unable to connect a i386-mysql server from an UltraSPARC client (bus error)

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 334339 mysql-client Bug#334339: mysql-client: Unable to connect a i386-mysql server from an UltraSPARC client (bus error) Bug reassigned from package `g++-4.0' to `mysql-client'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Bug#334339: mysql-client: Unable to connect a i386-mysql server from an UltraSPARC client (bus error)

2006-03-04 Thread Falk Hueffner
reassign 334339 mysql-client thanks The internal compiler error has been fixed long ago, so reassigning to mysql-client. -- Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334729: marked as done (strstream.h file missing)

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Mar 2006 13:50:58 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334729: strstream.h file missing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#346004: marked as done (iostream can't do files > 2GB)

2006-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Mar 2006 13:45:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346004: iostream can't do files > 2GB has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n