* Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-24 10:10]:
> > > There are various ways to work around this problem, but i would
> > > like to know what the real cause is there? Is avahi using the
> > > -pthreads flag wrong or is gcc not hanlding it the right way on
> > > mips ?
> >
> > Please se
The removal of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set.
Date of this removal: Tue Mar 21 21:22:40 2006
Please save this email message for future reference.
--
Please don't drop the BTS from the recipient list when replying.
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 04:27:46AM +0100, Christian E. Boehme wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 05:49:43PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Then you're obviously doing something wrong, but you haven't actually told
> > us what you're
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 05:49:43PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Then you're obviously doing something wrong, but you haven't actually told
> us what you're doing, which makes it difficult to help you debug it.
Well, as indicated earlier, I checked the binaries of the g++ driver
versions for pos
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:23:40PM +0100, Christian E. Boehme wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 08:36:05PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Huh? Are you really suggesting that the standard C++ compiler has been
> > unable to find any of its own header files for over a week in unstable, and
> > no
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 08:36:05PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> severity 358076 normal
> tags 358076 unreproducible
> thanks
???
> Huh? Are you really suggesting that the standard C++ compiler has been
> unable to find any of its own header files for over a week in unstable, and
> no one noti
Package: libffi4
Severity: wishlist
> Automatic build of pnet_0.7.4-1 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.106
...
> checking whether mmap with MAP_ANON(YMOUS) works... yes
> configure: error: "libffi has not been ported to mips64-unknown-linux-gnu."
> make: *** [build-tree/pnet-0.7.4/config.status] Error 1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 350989 gcc-3.3
Bug#350989: libtool on alpha causes linking errors when run on AFS
Bug reassigned from package `libtool' to `gcc-3.3'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
Package: gcc-3.4
Version: 3.4.5-2
Followup-For: Bug #357658
--- gcc-3.4-3.4.5/debian/control.m4 2006-03-17 23:15:24.0 +0100
+++ gcc-3.4-3.4.5-2/debian/control.m4 2006-03-21 11:17:20.0 +0100
@@ -56,6 +56,8 @@
Section: ifdef(`TARGET',`devel',`libs')
Priority: ifdef(`TARGET',
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.6-10
Followup-For: Bug #357629
--- gcc-3.3-3.3.6/debian/control.m4 2006-03-17 23:15:07.0 +0100
+++ gcc-3.3-3.3.6-10/debian/control.m4 2006-03-21 16:38:50.0 +0100
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@
Section: ifdef(`TARGET',`devel',`libs')
Priority: ifdef(`TARGE
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.2-9.my
Followup-For: Bug #357661
--- gcc-4.0-4.0.3/debian/control.m4 2006-03-20 20:07:22.0 +0100
+++ gcc-4.0-4.0.3-1/debian/control.m4 2006-03-21 16:33:32.0 +0100
@@ -103,6 +103,8 @@
Section: ifdef(`TARGET',`devel',`libs')
Priority: ifdef(`TARG
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfi
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-21 17:05 ---
This is the crazy parser getting the line number "wrong".
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
The line number mentioned in the "extra qualification" error is not
ideal. Instead of showing the line number on which the extra
qualification actually occurs it shows the last line of the
declaration.
(sid)6102:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] cat > test.cpp
class foo {
foo::foo(int a,
in
--
Bug 19664 depends on bug 21764, which changed state.
Bug 21764 Summary: visibility attributes on namespace scope
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21764
What|Old Value |New Value
-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 358050 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26785
Bug#358050: line number in extra qualification error not ideal (end of
declaration)
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26785.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
forwarded 358050 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26785
thanks
I've forwarded this now.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #6 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-03-21 15:33 ---
I think you're onto something here. Compiling xbsql with 4.1 against a
libxbase compiled with 4.1 works, but it fails against libxbase compiled with
4.0. So this may be an 4.0 issue - but it still leaves us with a binary
co
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-21 14:28 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
Please read the instructions there (in fact this should not have been pulled up
stream until then).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26755
--- You are receiving t
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-21 14:07 ---
And we cannot do without a testcase as looking at the source which you gave
link to does not give any obvious answers.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26755
--- You are receiving this mail be
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-21 14:06 ---
Reading this bug report, leads me to think there is a bug in 4.0.x.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26755
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watchin
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-03-21 12:09 ---
> We need a testcase to reproduce this.
We don't have a minimal test case yet but you can download the source of the
package which shows this problem and see for yourself. Maybe you can come up
with a smaller testcase.
ht
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 321215 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23454
Bug#321215: [PR 23454, fixed in 4.1] [4.0 regression] [sparc] ICE in
invert_exp_1, at jump.c:1719
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23454 to
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23454.
(By the way, this
Falk Hueffner writes:
> forwarded 356435 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26755
> thanks
>
> Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Falk, even without a minimal test case, do you think you can forward
> > this upstream.
>
> It seems Matthias has already forwarded it as PR 26755.
strange, I sent
forwarded 356435 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26755
thanks
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Falk, even without a minimal test case, do you think you can forward
> this upstream.
It seems Matthias has already forwarded it as PR 26755.
> I can also produce pregenerated code for xbsql (the p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 356435 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26755
Bug#356435: g++-4.1: may fail to generate code for base destructor defined
inline
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26755.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please co
26 matches
Mail list logo
