Bug#367952: shouldn't gcc-defaults 1.35 build depends on gcj-4.1-base instead of gcj-4.0-base

2006-05-18 Thread Petr Salinger
Package: gcc-defaults Version: 1.35 Hi, gcc-defaults 1.35 made gij-4.1/gcj-4.1 the default gij/gcj. I would expect that it should build-depends on gcj-4.1-base instead of gcj-4.0-base. Am I missing something ? Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubsc

Bug#367951: GCC

2006-05-18 Thread J. de Jong
Package: gcc Version: 4:4.0.2-2 I just tried installing the 'gcc' packages on debian etch testing amd en I got this error (in Dutch) : Pakket gcc is niet beschikbaar, hoewel er naar verwezen wordt door een ander pakket. Mogelijk betekent dit dat het pakket ontbreekt, verouderd is, of enkel besc

Bug#367856: Log for failed build of xautolock_1:2.1-7 (dist=unstable)

2006-05-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
The same: > Automatic build of xautolock_1:2.1-7 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by > sbuild/powerpc 0.44 ... > gcc -o xautolock -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing src/diy.o src/options.o > src/message.o src/state.o src/engine.o src/xautolock.o -lXss -lXext -lX11 > > src/engine.o:(.debug_

Bug#367856: Log for failed build of valgrind_1:3.1.1-1 (dist=stable)

2006-05-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
one more: > Automatic build of valgrind_1:3.1.1-1 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by > sbuild/powerpc 0.44 ... > gcc -O -g -Wmissing-prototypes -Winline -Wall -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wno-long-long -Wno-pointer-sign > -Wdeclaration-after-statement

Bug#367856: Log for failed build of ncbi-tools6_6.1.20060301-1 (dist=unstable)

2006-05-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
This appears to be the same problem: > Automatic build of ncbi-tools6_6.1.20060301-1 on > test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by sbuild/powerpc 0.44 ... > cc -o makeset -g -Wall -O2 -I../include -L../shlib -L../lib makeset.c > -lncbiobj -lncbi -lm > makeset.c: In function 'Nlm_Main': > makeset.c:2

Processed: Re: Bug#367856: bogus undefined reference error to static var with -g and -O

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 367856 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27657 Bug#367856: bogus undefined reference error to static var with -g and -O Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27657. > tags 367856 + upstream Bug#367856: bogus undefined re

Bug#367856: bogus undefined reference error to static var with -g and -O

2006-05-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20060508-1 I think this is a GCC bug. I've filed PR27657. > Automatic build of gconf_1.0.9-7.1 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by > sbuild/powerpc 0.44 ... > /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -DGCONF2_DIR="\"/usr/lib/gconf2\"" > -Wall -DG_DISABLE_CHECK

[Bug c++/26757] [4.2 regression] C++ front-end producing two DECLs with the same UID

2006-05-18 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.1.1 |4.2.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26757 --- Yo

[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

2006-05-18 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #364602 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27548 # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED # * remote reso

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status rep