Processed: severity of 383713 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > # missing manpages are not RC > severity 383713 important Bug#383713: gcc-4.1: Manpages are missing Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing

Bug#383713: gcc-4.1: Manpages are missing

Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-11 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.1 After upgrading to latest version of gcc-4.1 the manpages have disappeared from the package - g++ has the same bug. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, '

Re: gcj and etch freeze

On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:54:39PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Any chance gcj >= 4.1.1-11j1 can make it into etch? gcj-4.1 hasn't been frozen yet, but whether this gets into etch depends on when it's uploaded. > Would be very nice to have gcjwebplugin-4.1. We'll have no browser java > suppor

Bug#383705: please provide debugging symbols somewhere

Package: gcjwebplugin-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-11j1 Severity: wishlist Given the inmaturity of this plugin, I think it'd be a good idea to provide debugging symbols, either in this or a separate package, to aid in debugging tasks. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers te

Bug#383704: fails to initialise thread system

Package: gcjwebplugin-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-11j1 Severity: important $ firefox http://colemak.com/Compare GCJ PLUGIN: thread 0x1493b60: NP_Initialize GLib-ERROR **: The thread system is not yet initialized. aborting... Aborted -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers te

gnat 3.15p-19 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the gnat source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 3.15p-19 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more informatio

Bug#377331: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: gnat | 3.15p-19 | source libgnat-3.15p-1 | 3.15p-19 | i386, powerpc, sparc libgnatprj-3.15p | 3.15p-19 | i386, powerpc, sparc libgnatvsn-3.15p | 3.15p-19 | i386, powerpc, spar

Bug#368967: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: gcj-4.0 |4.0.3-2 | source, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc gcj-4.0-base |4.0.3-2 | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips,

Processed: will be closed in next upload

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 369938 + pending Bug#369938: segfault in cgraph_decide_inlining_incrementally Tags were: fixed-upstream upstream Tags added: pending > tags 379767 + pending Bug#379767: g++ goes into infinite loop compiling zhcon Tags were: fixed-upstream upstream

Processed: fixed upstream

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 376616 + fixed-upstream Bug#376616: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: warning: statement with no effect Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administ

[Bug libgcj/28698] [gcj] libgcj-bc only used when building shared libs, not executables

--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2006-08-18 11:38 --- Created an attachment (id=12091) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12091&action=view) example more simple example from the gettext source, compiled with gcj -C gnu/gettext/GetURL.java gcj -v -fjni -findir

gcj and etch freeze

Hi! Any chance gcj >= 4.1.1-11j1 can make it into etch? Would be very nice to have gcjwebplugin-4.1. We'll have no browser java support otherwise. -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to

Bug#382766: #380256 is a gij bug

On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:36:19PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Nicolas Duboc writes: > > > > Kaloian had already registered this bug on the jython package. Since > > he discovered that it is a gij bug, 380256's place is here. > > fine, so the jython bug is gone? Which jython bug ? -- Ni