Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:53:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Bug c++/29229] g++ fails to find dependent name in template
from instantiation context (forwarded from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 387222 + fixed-upstream
Bug#387222: [PR29228] ICE in gfc_trans_deferred_array, at
fortran/trans-array.c:4514
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> retitle 387222 [PR29228, fixed in 4.2] ICE in gfc_trans_deferred_array, at
> fortran/tr
Please recheck with gcc-4.1.1-14
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:59:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350287: gij-4.0: infinite loop building ikvm on amd64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
what's the current status?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 387765 + unreproducible
Bug#387765: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.weakref' for every program
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:29:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.weakref' for every program
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:06:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386350: gcc-4.1: manpage is a dandling symlink
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Accepted:
gnat-4.1-base_4.1.1-14_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gnat-4.1/gnat-4.1-base_4.1.1-14_i386.deb
gnat-4.1_4.1.1-14.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gnat-4.1/gnat-4.1_4.1.1-14.diff.gz
gnat-4.1_4.1.1-14.dsc
to pool/main/g/gnat-4.1/gnat-4.1_4.1.1-14.dsc
gnat-4.1_4.1.1-14_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gnat-4
gnat-4.1_4.1.1-14_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gnat-4.1_4.1.1-14.dsc
gnat-4.1_4.1.1-14.diff.gz
gnat-4.1-base_4.1.1-14_i386.deb
libgnatprj-dev_4.1.1-14_i386.deb
libgnatprj4.1_4.1.1-14_i386.deb
libgnat-4.1_4.1.1-14_i386.deb
libgnatvsn-dev_4.1.1-1
On 26 September 2006 at 20:10, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
| * Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-26 13:07]:
| > Nice work, and I can surely try this. Now, I don't see a recent non-2.17
| > version of binutils anywhere in .deb form for i386. Before I go off an
| > rebuild, could you place
On 26 September 2006 at 11:34, John Schmidt wrote:
| To follow-up on my experiences with g++-4.1 code and extremely slow link
| times, I did a chroot and pulled in old versions of g++-4.1 and binutils from
| snapshot.debian.net to build my big c++ application.
|
| Here is a table with the follo
* Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-26 13:07]:
> Nice work, and I can surely try this. Now, I don't see a recent non-2.17
> version of binutils anywhere in .deb form for i386. Before I go off an
> rebuild, could you place your version somewhere where I can fetch it from?
http://snapsh
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-26 17:47 ---
When I get home, I might have a look at this, most likely pt.c needs to be
extended.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29226
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bu
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-26 17:46 ---
> This is invalid as a->*mem_ptr cannot be used outside of a function.
that should be a "function call".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29225
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29230
--- You
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 11:34, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 5 September 2006 at 18:41, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
> | On Sep 3, 2006, at 5:57 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > | s/small/self-contained/ then. Do you have some example where the
> | > | linking process of some c++ files takes ages,
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 02:40:49PM -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>
> One thing I noticed is that there are a lot of "problems" (in your
> terminology) caused by unneeded dependencies on libgcc1
> (/lib/libgcc_s.so.1). From my quick investigation, it appears that the
> C++ and Fortran compilers (
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 389148 + fixed-upstream
Bug#389148: objc: ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:6932
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 388263 [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at
> gimplify.c:4513
Bug#388263: [PR29225] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at
varasm.c:883
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
--- Comment #6 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-26 13:58 ---
Yes, 4.0 works, so it's really only a problem in 4.1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29230
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--
T
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed
)46:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~]
This is with 4.1.2 20060926.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29230
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-26 13:37 ---
This doesn't happen with gcc 4.2, nor, apparently, with 4.0.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-26 13:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=12329)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12329&action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29230
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Package: g++-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-13
Severity: minor
Hello,
Apropos the recent posting by Christian Aichinger and his checklib
scripts with output at http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib.
Some of these problems (at least in the case of swish++) are caused
by the fact that when "g++" is used in the lin
--
pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2006-09-26 13:37:44 |2006-09-26 13:38:11
date||
ht
Package: libgcj-common
Version: 1:4.1.1-13
Severity: grave
Preparing to replace libgcj-common 1:4.1.1-13 (using
.../libgcj-common_1%3a4.1.1-14_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libgcj-common ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libgcj-common_1%3a4.1.1-14_all.deb (--unpack):
tryin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> # was not in a stable release, so replaces are not RC
> severity 389539 important
Bug#389539: file conflict with java-gcj-compat-dev
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-26 09:20 ---
I'll try to take a look.
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #3 from michael dot haubenwallner at salomon dot at 2006-09-26
07:28 ---
Err, the patch from Bug#26957#c16 is already applied and works.
This is another ICE.
Difference in testcase is that the second ICE occurs when the 'long double
value' is passed to another virtual metho
--- Comment #22 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-26 07:10
---
*** Bug 29209 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26957
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or a
Accepted:
cpp-4.1_4.1.1-14_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.1-14_m68k.deb
fastjar_4.1.1-14_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fastjar_4.1.1-14_m68k.deb
fixincludes_4.1.1-14_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fixincludes_4.1.1-14_m68k.deb
g++-4.1_4.1.1-14_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-26 07:10 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26957 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-26 07:00 ---
Reduced testcase:
struct ComputedAttribute {
int descriptor();
};
class AttributeDescriptor {};
template
struct less_member_2_m
{
typedef R ( T::*T_mem_ptr );
T_mem_ptr mem_ptr;
template
bool operator()(
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #12328|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type||
http://
gcc-4.1_4.1.1ds1-14_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.1-14_m68k.deb
libgcc2_4.1.1-14_m68k.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.1-14_m68k.deb
protoize_4.1.1-14_m68k.deb
fixincludes_4.1.1-14_m68k.deb
libmudflap0_4.1.1-14_m68k.deb
libmudflap0-dev_4.1.1-14_
--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot
|
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-26 07:05 ---
Reduced testcase:
template
static int label (int w)
{
sizeof(int[w]);
}
int a = label(1);
So I was correct :)
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Add
--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot
|
44 matches
Mail list logo
