--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-29 17:59 ---
This seems more like an ABI issue in older 4.1's and 4.2's rather than a bug in
the newer 4.1.2 and 4.2.0.
I bet we had an accidental ABI change in 4.0.0 and we have no fixed that.
I am thinking we should close this
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #12355|text/x-patch|text/plain
mime type||
http://
Package: g77-3.4
Version: 3.4.6-4
Severity: normal
Yet another casualty of the "Users are our priority" release:
the f77 alternative refers to --- now nonexistent --- manpage g77.1.gz.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
||debia
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-13
Severity: wishlist
Please re-add GFDL documents in a non-free package.
Alternatively, provide made in Debian manpages for gcc, cpp, g++ ...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stab
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #388596
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29178
# * remote status changed: NEW -> RESOLVED
# * remote resolution cha
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #382746
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29231
# * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED
usertags 382746 + statu
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gnat-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #390101
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29283
# * remote status changed: (?) -> WAITING
usertags 390101 + status-W
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.1
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report f
> I would suggest renaming the binary -doc packages, and providing the
> original ones.
Is this better than what is suggested in the bug report (detect and remove
symlink in preinst)?
If packages will be renamed, users won't get transparent upgrade to new
packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
cpp-doc_4.1.1.nf2_all.deb
to pool/contrib/g/gcc-doc-defaults/cpp-doc_4.1.1.nf2_all.deb
gcc-doc-defaults_4.1.1.nf2.dsc
to pool/contrib/g/gcc-doc-defaults/gcc-doc-defaults_4.1.1.nf2.dsc
gcc-doc-defaults_4.1.1.nf2.tar.gz
to pool/contrib/g/gcc-doc-defaults/gcc-doc-defaults_4.1.1.nf2.ta
gcc-doc-defaults_4.1.1.nf2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-doc-defaults_4.1.1.nf2.dsc
gcc-doc-defaults_4.1.1.nf2.tar.gz
gcc-doc_4.1.1.nf2_all.deb
cpp-doc_4.1.1.nf2_all.deb
gfortran-doc_4.1.1.nf2_all.deb
treelang-doc_4.1.1.nf2_all.deb
Greetings,
> > The current behaviour breaks several java applications that need the
> > Sun Java runtime engine on a regular base.
>
> the priorities are as discussed on debian-java. please don't file bugs
> on single packages.
Please point me to a discussion where it was decided to assign 1041
as priority
I would suggest renaming the binary -doc packages, and providing the
original ones.
Sven Joachim writes:
> Package: gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg
> Version: 4.1.1-nf1
> Severity: serious
>
> In previous versions of gcc-4.1-doc (up to 4.1.1-10),
> /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-doc was a symlink to gcc-4.1-base.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 390101 upstream moreinfo
Bug#390101: gnat-4.1: Bug box in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6393
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream, moreinfo
> forwarded 390101 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29283
Bug#390101: gnat-4.1: Bug box in expand_expr_add
Package: gnat-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-14
Severity: normal
While builing libtexttools on alpha:
gcc-4.1 -c -I./ -g -O2 -gnatafno -gnatVa -I.. -I-
/build/buildd/libtexttools-2.0.3/windows.adb
windows.adb:273:14: warning: "x" may be referenced before it has a value
windows.adb:273:17: warning: "y" may be
Package: gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg
Version: 4.1.1-nf1
Severity: serious
In previous versions of gcc-4.1-doc (up to 4.1.1-10),
/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-doc was a symlink to gcc-4.1-base. Because
dpkg follows the symlink when upgrading the package, your files end up
in /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base, overwri
17 matches
Mail list logo
