[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] [4.1/4.2 Regression] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Summary|[DR 224] error: non-template|[DR 224

[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

-- tbm at cyrius dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot ||or

Re: Status of gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-16

Martin Michlmayr writes: > Matthias Klose asked me to test gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-16 (4.1.2 20061007) > to see whether it can be used instead of gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-13 (4.1.2 > 20060901) currently in testing. I found the following three > regressions, two of which are issues where code is rejected that > 4

Results for 4.2.0 20061015 (experimental) testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

uccesses 2 # of expected failures 66 # of unsupported tests 72 === g++ Summary === # of expected passes26327 # of unexpected successes 3 # of expected failures 133 # of unsupported tests 173 /home/tbm/build/gcc-snapshot-

[Bug c++/29435] [4.1/4.2 Regression] seg fault with sizeof and templates

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.1/4.2 Regression]|[4.1/4.2 Regression] seg |segmentation fault

[Bug c++/29435] [4.1/4.2 Regression] segmentation fault

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29435 --- You a

[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #379886 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28490 # * remote status changed: NEW -> RESOLVED # * remote resolutio

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #380541 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28545 # * remote status changed: UNCONFIRMED -> ASSIGNED usertags 380541 -

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.2

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.2 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #351786 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16006 # * remote status changed: RESOLVED -> REOPENED # * remote resolutio

[Bug c++/29408] [4.1/4.2 regression] parse error for valid code

--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 21:21 --- There is long-standing confusion in the C++ standard regarding the naming of destructors in various situations. (Part of the issue is to what extent destructors have names, and how the injection of class names int

gcc-defaults 1.46 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the gcc-defaults source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.42 Current version: 1.46 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. --

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.2 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

[Bug target/29474] [4.1/4.2 Regression] reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393 on m68k with -O -fPIC

-- fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot |

Bug#393275: -O2 on Alpha makes code crash

Package: g++ Version: 4:4.1.1-11 Severity: normal Hello, I'm trying to debug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=393194 and I found out that the test suite passes with -O0, -O1 and -O3 but fails with -O2. g++ is gcc version 4.1.2 20061007 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-16) g++-4.0 (gcc

Bug#123468: [Bug c/6906] warn about asserts with side effects

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 19:45 --- *** Bug 29480 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

Bug#123468: [Bug c/6906] warn about asserts with side effects

-- fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot |

FW: New supervisor position available

Hello , Find out how to make 1.5 - 3.5k a day from your house. 800.439.1088 Contact me at my number if you can return phone calls. Thank you, Phil Philips -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#387990: marked as done (ICE in move_block_after_check, at haifa-sched.c:4337)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Oct 2006 08:47:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387990: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20061015-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#389148: marked as done (objc: ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:6932)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Oct 2006 08:47:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#389148: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20061015-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#390993: marked as done ([PR29341] [4.2 regression] ICE: RTL flag check: INSN_DELETED_P used with unexpected rt x code 'plus' in output_constant_pool_1)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Oct 2006 08:47:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#390993: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20061015-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#387728: marked as done (segfault in add_candidates)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Oct 2006 08:47:33 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387728: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20061015-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

gcc-snapshot_20061015-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gcc-snapshot_20061015-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20061015-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20061015-1.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20061015-1.tar.gz gcc-snapshot_20061015-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20061015-1_amd64.deb Override e

Processing of gcc-snapshot_20061015-1_amd64.changes

gcc-snapshot_20061015-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-snapshot_20061015-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20061015-1.tar.gz gcc-snapshot_20061015-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

Bug#392974: gcc-4.1: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] package contains non-free documentation

reopen 392974 thanks Aurelien Jarno writes: > Steve Langasek a écrit : > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:02:10PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> Aurelien Jarno writes: > >>> The package (at least the source) contains GFDL docs with invariant > >>> sections and/or cover texts. > > > >> please don't

Processed: Re: Bug#392974: gcc-4.1: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] package contains non-free documentation

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 392974 Bug#392974: gcc-4.1: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] package contains non-free documentation Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#391445: GCC 4.1 BUG - Cross compiling

> On 10/15/06, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 999_lib64_for_cross.dpatch is still available in #231707 logs. I've > > not yet tested if it applies to current binutils package, and if this > > will fix #391445, but I'm almost sure the problem is here. > > Yes, it helps, just t

[Bug tree-optimization/28544] [4.2 regression] ICE in add_virtual_operand, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1309

--- Comment #13 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-15 09:01 --- (In reply to comment #8) > I can trivially fix this, but the code isn't going to do what you want when > i'm > done, since it is an aliasing violation :) > > The assert in question just happens to be good at catching them.

[Bug target/28181] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393 on m68k

--- Comment #8 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-15 08:43 --- Created an attachment (id=12436) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12436&action=view) testcase another testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28181 --- You are receiving this mail

[Bug target/29474] [4.1/4.2 Regression] reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393 on m68k with -O -fPIC

--- Comment #3 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-15 08:37 --- Created an attachment (id=12435) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12435&action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29474 --- You are receiving this mail becaus

[Bug target/29474] [4.1/4.2 Regression] reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393 on m68k with -O -fPIC

--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-15 08:36 --- The original preprocessed source shows the problem with 4.2 too. -- tbm at cyrius dot com changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/29474] [4.1 Regression] reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393 on m68k with -O -fPIC

--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-15 08:34 --- Created an attachment (id=12434) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12434&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29474 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Bug target/29474] [4.1 Regression] reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393 on m68k with -O -fPIC

-- tbm at cyrius dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||debian-gcc at lists dot ||debian

Hey are they starting layoffs yet?

Greetings , Find out how to generate 1.5 - 3.5k daily from your house. 800.513.3876 Call me at my number if you can return phone calls. Regards, Weldon Schmidt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#385327: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393

* Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-01 17:38]: > | (insn 200 442 201 24 > /build/buildd/vtk-5.0.1/Imaging/vtkImageMaskBits.cxx:104 (set (reg:HI 0 %d0 > [80])| > (and:HI (mem:HI (reg:SI 11 %a3) [118 S2 A16]) > |

Welcome to Al-Manahel Newsletter List

The subscription of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Thanks for subscribing! Date of this subscription: Sun Oct 15 01:26:04 2006 Please save this email message for future reference. -

Processed: forward

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > fowarded 385327 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29474 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > tags 385327 + upstream Bug#385327: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393 There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > -- Stopping proc