Bug#152501: Ina Dill wrote:

2006-10-17 Thread Ina Dill
hi Ina i hope this is your e-mail. I was pleased to meet you the other day. I expect you are actually had like the New York. So much so much happening all the time, lots of great opportunities. And speaking of opportunities, the deal I was speaking you about other day embraces a company known

Bug#121282: Cameron Obrien wrote:

2006-10-17 Thread Cameron Obrien
hi Cameron i hope this is your mailbox. I was like to see you the other day. I hope you are actually had like the New York. So much so much happening all the time, lots of great opportunities. And speaking of opportunities, the deal I was speaking you about yesterday embraces a company named

Bug#203212: Kate Worley wrote:

2006-10-17 Thread Kate Worley
hi Kate i hope this is your mailbox. I was pleased to meet you the other day. I hope you was excited about New York. So much so much happening all the time, lots of great opportunities. And speaking of opportunities, the deal I was speaking you about yesterday embraces a company called Tex-H

Bug#173513: Darius Morris wrote:

2006-10-17 Thread Darius Morris
hi Darius i hope this is your email. I was glad to meet you the other day. I expect you are truly had like the New York. So much so much happening all the time, lots of great opportunities. And speaking of opportunities, the deal I was speaking you about other day included a company known as

Bug#192568: Jose Thorne wrote:

2006-10-17 Thread Jose Thorne
hi Jose i hope this is your e-mail. I was glad to meet you the other day. I hope you are actually had like the New York. So much so much happening all the time, lots of great opportunities. And speaking of opportunities, the deal I was speaking you about yesterday embraces a company known as

Bug#197504: Monty Dickey wrote:

2006-10-17 Thread Monty Dickey
hi Monty i hope this is your email. I was like to see you the other day. I hope you are actually had like the New York. So much so much happening all the time, lots of great opportunities. And speaking of opportunities, the deal I was speaking you about day before included a company called Te

Bug#204407: Gerardo Levy wrote:

2006-10-17 Thread Gerardo Levy
hi Gerardo i hope this is your e-mail. I was pleased to meet you the other day. I hope you are truly had like the New York. So much so much happening all the time, lots of great opportunities. And speaking of opportunities, the deal I was speaking you about day before included a company known

Bug#202016: Irma Lawrence wrote:

2006-10-17 Thread Irma Lawrence
hi Irma i hope this is your mailbox. I was happy to see you the other day. I hope you are really had like the New York. So much so much happening all the time, lots of great opportunities. And speaking of opportunities, the deal I was speaking you about other day included a company known as T

Bug#95318: Queen Vera wrote:

2006-10-17 Thread Queen Vera
hi Queen i hope this is your mailbox. I was glad to meet you the other day. I expect you are truly had like the New York. So much so much happening all the time, lots of great opportunities. And speaking of opportunities, the deal I was speaking you about other day included a company called T

Bug#391445: GCC 4.1 BUG - Cross compiling

2006-10-17 Thread Hector Oron
Confirmed - It compiles clean. Tried with dpkg-cross version 1.32Thanks, Hector OronP.S.- I submit these patches to be more handy2006/10/15, Nikita V. Youshchenko < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:> On 10/15/06, Nikita V. Youshchenko < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > 999_lib64_for_cross.dpatch is still available i

Attention To Your Eductaion

2006-10-17 Thread Office Of Enrollment
Attention Potential Candidate: You may now qualify for our unique University Education Program. For a limited amount of students - No tests, classes, books, or interviews required* Yourself, and a limited number of other candidates are invited to take advantage of this Special Enrollment Bache

Bug#380251: building cross compilers

2006-10-17 Thread Hector Oron
It would be nice if somebody on the embedded list could have a look at #380251.I have slightly modified README.cross more up to date. Patch attached.If you are trying to build a cross gcc-4.1, take a look to #391445.Regards, Hector Oron README.cross.patch Description: Binary data

[Bug libstdc++/16006] Conversions of numbers in fi_FI.UTF-8 produces incorrect UTF-8

2006-10-17 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
-- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pcarlini at suse dot de http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16006

[Bug debug/26881] [4.1 Regression] internal compiler error in dwarf2out_finish

2006-10-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #23 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-17 11:33 --- *** Bug 27036 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug debug/27036] ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:14116

2006-10-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-17 11:33 --- It is (and fixed). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26881 *** -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug debug/26881] [4.1 Regression] internal compiler error in dwarf2out_finish

2006-10-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #22 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-17 11:31 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug debug/26881] [4.1 Regression] internal compiler error in dwarf2out_finish

2006-10-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-17 11:30 --- Subject: Bug 26881 Author: rguenth Date: Tue Oct 17 11:30:28 2006 New Revision: 117823 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117823 Log: 2006-10-17 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#393561: marked as done (lib32gcj-bc: no copyright file and no changelog)

2006-10-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Oct 2006 22:13:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393351: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.47 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now