Bug#386892: marked as done (gij-4.1: segfaults on ppc on startup)

2007-01-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:01:23 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#386892: udate of libc6 resolved the problem has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#401947: marked as done (gcj-4.1: Error when you use a swt.jar library)

2007-01-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:37:00 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#401947: gcj-4.1: Error when you use a swt.jar library has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Bug#401947: gcj-4.1: Error when you use a swt.jar library

2007-01-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 401947 - patch Bug#401947: gcj-4.1: Error when you use a swt.jar library Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch > tags 401947 + moreinfo Bug#401947: gcj-4.1: Error when you use a swt.jar library There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > - -l

Bug#406550: libstdc++5-3.3-dev: gettext macro is defined after '#include '

2007-01-11 Thread Németh Márton
Package: libstdc++5-3.3-dev Version: 1:3.3.5-13 Severity: normal After a simple '#include ' in a C++ file the "gettext" macro is defined. --- cut here --- test.cc #include #ifdef gettext #error "The gettext macro is already defined!" #endif --- cut here --- end of test.cc -

Processed: retitle gcj reports

2007-01-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 186922 [PR 1058, fixed in 4.3] ICE compiling freenet Bug#186922: [PR 10581] ICE compiling freenet Changed Bug title. > retitle 369873 [PR 29194, fixed in 4.3] gcj fails to import package from > project Bug#369873: [PR29194] gcj-4.1: fails to i

Re: Is a new upload of gcc-4.1 to unstable planned?

2007-01-11 Thread Matthias Klose
Ludovic Brenta writes: > I have applied and reviewed Kevin Brown's patch that creates new > packages containing debugging symbols for libgnat, libgnatvsn and > libgnatprj. This patch only affects Ada, and I am almost ready to > upload gnat-4.1_4.1.1-22 to unstable. However I would like to know >

Is a new upload of gcc-4.1 to unstable planned?

2007-01-11 Thread Ludovic Brenta
I have applied and reviewed Kevin Brown's patch that creates new packages containing debugging symbols for libgnat, libgnatvsn and libgnatprj. This patch only affects Ada, and I am almost ready to upload gnat-4.1_4.1.1-22 to unstable. However I would like to know whether a -22 upload of gcc-4.1 i