Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

2007-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status rep

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcj-4.1

2007-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.1 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

2007-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.0

2007-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

[Bug tree-optimization/30088] [4.1 Regression] Unexpected compilation results: -O1 vs. -O1 -fstrict-aliasing

2007-02-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 14:52 --- Actually the original testcase also fails with 4.1.0. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/30088] [4.1 Regression] Unexpected compilation results: -O1 vs. -O1 -fstrict-aliasing

2007-02-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 14:10 --- 4.1.0 works, so this is a regression on the branch. Janis, can you hunt what broke it? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/30088] [4.1 Regression] Unexpected compilation results: -O1 vs. -O1 -fstrict-aliasing

2007-02-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 14:07 --- Created an attachment (id=13008) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13008&action=view) reduced testcase This is a reduced testcase (still requires libstdc++ at link time) where you can see the wrong

[Bug tree-optimization/30088] [4.1 Regression] Unexpected compilation results: -O1 vs. -O1 -fstrict-aliasing

2007-02-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 12:30 --- We have (alias1): Type memory tags TMT.89, UID 17988, struct basic_string,std::allocator >, is an alias tag, is addressable, is global, call clobbered ... TMT.95, UID 17994, float, is addressable, may aliases: { SF

[Bug tree-optimization/30088] [4.1 Regression] Unexpected compilation results: -O1 vs. -O1 -fstrict-aliasing

2007-02-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 12:17 --- Slightly reduced testcase: #include #include struct A { A() : _x(0.0), _y(0.0) { } float& f(const int& i) { return (i == 0 ? _x : _y); } float _x, _y; }; A h(const char* s) { A a; std::string b("");

Bug#409752: g++: Fails to compile a very simple file

2007-02-05 Thread Vincent Richard
Subject: g++: Fails to compile a very simple file Package: g++ Version: 4.0.3-7 Severity: important Since an upgrade on Friday 02/02 (IIRC), I can't manage to compile a very simple program with g++: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp/bug $ cat hello.cpp #include int main() { std::cout << "Hello world!"