Hello Camm and GCC maintainers,
I heard about the idea of switch g77 to gfortran as the default Fortran
compiler (actually it was mentioned again today as the reply to the GCC
4.2 transition plan to d-d-a list). As I use BLAS/LAPACK, I wanted to
play with building these Debian package with gfortr
--- Comment #10 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-06-28 23:04 ---
Fixed.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|---
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-28 23:02 ---
Subject: Bug 32509
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Jun 28 23:02:05 2007
New Revision: 126098
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126098
Log:
2007-06-28 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libstd
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-28 22:59 ---
Subject: Bug 32509
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Jun 28 22:59:00 2007
New Revision: 126097
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126097
Log:
2007-06-28 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libstd
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-28 22:58 ---
Subject: Bug 32509
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Jun 28 22:58:32 2007
New Revision: 126096
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126096
Log:
2007-06-28 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libstd
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20070613-1
Severity: wishlist
README.Debian says:
.-
| You might also like to use a shell script to wrap up this
| funcationality, e.g.
|
| place in /usr/local/bin/gcc-snapshot and chmod +x it
|
| --- snip --
| #! /bin/sh
| LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/li
retitle 430957 Exponential time usage in PRE at -O3
severity 430957 normal
tags 430957 + upstream
forwarded 430957 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR32540
thanks
Hi,
this is a problem with exponential time usage in PRE. I've filed a bug
report upstream.
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 430957 Exponential time usage in PRE at -O3
Bug#430957: compiling with -O3 takes too long/hangs on some files
Changed Bug title to `Exponential time usage in PRE at -O3' from `compiling
with -O3 takes too long/hangs on some files'.
> severity
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 12:56:26PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Anyways, changing this won't solve the problem with new xulrunner
> > upstream releases... and the real problem is still on the ftp archive
> > anyways...
>
> I very much doubt that for subsubminor version cha
Whenever I use gcc-4.2-multilib to compile an amd64 program on i386, at the
link stage I get a message:
/usr/bin/ld: error
in /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.1/64/crtend.o(.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr
table will be created.
The command returns successfully, so this is mostly harmless, except t
On 6/28/07, Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please provide the .i file produced by adding -save-temps.
Attached gzipped .i file.
server-th.i.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
"\"Török" Edvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: gcc-snapshot
> Version: 20070613-1
> Severity: minor
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
>
> Using gcc-4.3 snapshot to compile with -O3:
> $ time /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
> -I../../../clamd -I.. -I.
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20070613-1
Severity: minor
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Using gcc-4.2 to compile with -O3 server-th.c:
$ time gcc-4.2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../clamd -I.. -I../../..
-I../../../shared -I../../../libclamav-pedantic -Wextra -Wall
-Wbad-f
Mike Hommey writes:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:21:37PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Mike Hommey writes:
> > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:02:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL
> > > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Mike Hommey writes:
> > > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:4
--- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-06-28 10:22 ---
Ok, I'm implementing the idea.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:31:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426922: libffi.la is missing from libffi4-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:17:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430688: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2-20070627-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:17:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429660: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2-20070627-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:17:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428926: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2-20070627-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:17:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430395: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2-20070627-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:17:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429660: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2-20070627-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:17:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429660: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2-20070627-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:17:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429660: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2-20070627-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:17:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429660: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2-20070627-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:17:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429660: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2-20070627-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:17:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429660: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2-20070627-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Accepted:
cpp-4.2-doc_4.2-20070627-1_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.2/cpp-4.2-doc_4.2-20070627-1_all.deb
cpp-4.2_4.2-20070627-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.2/cpp-4.2_4.2-20070627-1_i386.deb
cpp-4.2_4.2-20070627-1_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.2/cpp-4.2_4.2-20070627-1_powerpc.deb
cpp-4.2_4
gcc-4.2_4.2-20070627-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
treelang-4.2_4.2-20070627-1_powerpc.deb
gobjc++-4.2-multilib_4.2-20070627-1_sparc.deb
libstdc++6-4.2-dbg_4.2-20070627-1_sparc.deb
gcc-4.2_4.2-20070627-1.diff.gz
gcc-4.2-base_4.2-20070627-1_powerp
28 matches
Mail list logo
