--- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 22:15 ---
Subject: Bug 31639
Author: dfranke
Date: Thu Jul 12 22:15:11 2007
New Revision: 126605
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126605
Log:
gcc/fortran:
2007-07-12 Daniel Franke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Martin Orr wrote:
> binutils (>= 2.17cvs20070426) | 2.17.20070406cvs-2
I don't know if it makes difference but you should try to upgrade
binutils away from that version from experimental.
Apt and other utils think that experimental has bigger version number
than more recent in unstable.
Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2-20070707-1
Severity: important
When I build the kernel (either 2.6.21 or 2.6.22) with gcc 4.2-20070707-1,
then try to boot, I get a hang in udevsettle. If I build with gcc
4.2-20070627-1, everything is fine.
The file which matters is arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c. Th
gcc compile the example that you find in attach without errors
ciao
Emiliano
#include
static inline char * strrchr(const char * s, int c)
{
int d0, d1;
register char * __res;
__asm__ __volatile__(
"movb %%al,%%ah\n"
"1:\tlodsb\n\t"
"cmpb %%ah,%%al\n\t"
"jne 2f\n\t"
"leal -1(%%esi),%0\n"
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ludovic Brenta writes:
>> Actually, since that latest upload of gcc-4.2 introduced RC bugs in the
>> back-end,
>
> Debian bug numbers?
#432604, #432489
Now that I look at them I see they're not RC, sorry about that. They
would probably be RC if gcc-4
Ludovic Brenta writes:
> Actually, since that latest upload of gcc-4.2 introduced RC bugs in the
> back-end,
Debian bug numbers?
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6 matches
Mail list logo
