crt1.o & crti.o are missing in the gcc library

2007-09-02 Thread Chan Lee
Hi, After I did install Debian using DVD set from CheapBytes, I found that the gcc is not installed. Looking around what's the best way to install gcc, I found the 'apt' and did install the gcc using 'apt-get install gcc', which asked to mount the DVD1 and then the gcc installation was compl

Processed: retitle 440046 to optimization generates warning for casts

2007-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > retitle 440046 optimization generates warning for casts Bug#440046: optmization generates warning for casts Changed Bug title to `optimization generates warning for casts' from `optm

Bug#408888: closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#408888: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-15)

2007-09-02 Thread Samuel Thibault
Matthias Klose, le Mon 03 Sep 2007 00:43:15 +0200, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault writes: > > Again, could you please apply the attached patch? Some of the > > hurd-specific fixes got merged in the latest snapshot you took of gcc. > > again, please follow the SVN. What do you mean? The previous su

Bug#408888: closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#408888: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-15)

2007-09-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Samuel Thibault writes: > Hi, > > Again, could you please apply the attached patch? Some of the > hurd-specific fixes got merged in the latest snapshot you took of gcc. again, please follow the SVN. the patch is now applied for 4.1. please check the 4.2 and 4.3 branches as well. what is the u

Bug#408888: closed by Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#408888: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-15)

2007-09-02 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hi, Again, could you please apply the attached patch? Some of the hurd-specific fixes got merged in the latest snapshot you took of gcc. Samuel Index: debian/patches/libjava-hurdfix.dpatch === --- debian/patches/libjava-hurdfix.dpat

Processed: bug 414178 is forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27574

2007-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > forwarded 414178 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27574 Bug#414178: No debugging symbols of local variables in constructor and destructors. Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to ht

Processed: reassign 440545 to gcc-4.2

2007-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7 > reassign 440545 gcc-4.2 4.2.1-4 Bug#440545: Miscompilation casting signed long to void* in 64bit system Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `gcc-4.2'. > End of message, stopping pro

Bug#440569: gappletviewer-4.2: package seems to be empty (libgcjwebplugin.so missing)

2007-09-02 Thread Patrik Hagglund
Package: gappletviewer-4.2 Version: 4.2.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C

Bug#440545: Miscompilation casting signed long to void* in 64bit system

2007-09-02 Thread Marko Lindqvist
Package: gcc Version: 4:4.2.1-5 Debian GNU/Linux lenny/sid amd64 > gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,treelang --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-inc

gdc-4.1 override disparity

2007-09-02 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_amd64.deb: package says priority is standard, override says optional. gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_i386.deb: package says priority is standard, override says option

gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_multi.changes ACCEPTED

2007-09-02 Thread Debian Installer
Warning: gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_amd64.deb control file lists priority as `optional', but changes file has `standard'. Warning: gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_sparc.deb control file lists priority as `optional', but changes file has `standard'. Warning: gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_powerpc.deb control

Processing of gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_multi.changes

2007-09-02 Thread Archive Administrator
gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1.dsc gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1.diff.gz gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_i386.deb gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_amd64.deb gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1_powerpc.deb gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.

Bug#173513: [Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

2007-09-02 Thread guillaume dot melquiond at ens-lyon dot fr
--- Comment #14 from guillaume dot melquiond at ens-lyon dot fr 2007-09-02 11:56 --- Created an attachment (id=14150) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14150&action=view) Implements folding of "(&function & 1)" I encountered the same issue with some heavy template cod

[Bug target/33277] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap check failures ICE's

2007-09-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 11:36 --- I saw this also asn asked about it on IRC. Note please don't CC anyone unless you know that they caused the bug. They don't want to be getting all bug reports. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug target/33256] internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at config/mips/mips.c:5579

2007-09-02 Thread tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 09:27 --- Created an attachment (id=14149) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14149&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33256 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Bug target/33256] internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at config/mips/mips.c:5579

2007-09-02 Thread tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 09:26 --- This happens with 4.0 - 4.3. gcc 3.4 didn't have the -msym32 option. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33256 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or

[Bug target/33256] internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at config/mips/mips.c:5579

2007-09-02 Thread tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug target/33256] internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at config/mips/mips.c:5579

2007-09-02 Thread tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daney at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug target/33256] internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at config/mips/mips.c:5579

2007-09-02 Thread tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 09:08 --- I can confirm this with FSF gcc 4.1.3 20070902 -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/33256] internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at config/mips/mips.c:5579

2007-09-02 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-09-02 08:40 --- I can reproduce this with gcc-4.1 -c -mabi=64 -msym32 -mno-abicalls -O using Debian's gcc. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33256 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC