LAST_UPDATED: Mon Aug 20 12:22:45 UTC 2007 (revision 127646)
Target: sparc-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.3.0 20071020 (experimental) [trunk revision 127646] (Debian
20071020-1)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c3a2003
FAIL: c460001
FAIL: c460002
FAIL: cxg2001
FAIL: cxg2002
FAIL:
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Oct 19 09:23:29 UTC 2007 (revision 129483)
Target: sparc-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.1.3 20071019 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-17)
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-ti
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Aug 20 12:22:45 UTC 2007 (revision 127646)
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.3.0 20071116 (experimental) [trunk revision 127646] (Debian
20071116-1)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2315
# of
(new) gdc-4.2_0.25-4.2.2-3.diff.gz optional devel
(new) gdc-4.2_0.25-4.2.2-3.dsc optional devel
(new) gdc-4.2_0.25-4.2.2-3_amd64.deb optional devel
The D compiler
This is the D compiler, which compiles D on platforms supported by the gcc
compiler. It uses the GCC backend to generate optimised cod
Accepted:
gdc-4.1_0.25-4.1.2-17exp2.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gdc-4.1/gdc-4.1_0.25-4.1.2-17exp2.diff.gz
gdc-4.1_0.25-4.1.2-17exp2.dsc
to pool/main/g/gdc-4.1/gdc-4.1_0.25-4.1.2-17exp2.dsc
gdc-4.1_0.25-4.1.2-17exp2_alpha.deb
to pool/main/g/gdc-4.1/gdc-4.1_0.25-4.1.2-17exp2_alpha.deb
gdc-4.1_0.25-
Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447554: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20071116-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
--- Comment #9 from ian at davenant dot greenend dot org dot uk 2007-11-16
21:18 ---
All that's really needed is to remember all of the unknown -Wno-* options seen.
From the point of view of the core of the option parser, accept them, but just
store the string as provided. When the fi
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.2
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #451047
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR34091
# * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED
usertags 451047 + statu
gdc-4.2_0.25-4.2.2-3_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gdc-4.2_0.25-4.2.2-3.dsc
gdc-4.2_0.25-4.2.2.orig.tar.gz
gdc-4.2_0.25-4.2.2-3.diff.gz
gdc-4.2_0.25-4.2.2-3_amd64.deb
gdc-4.2_0.25-4.2.2-3_hppa.deb
gdc-4.2_0.25-4.2.2-3_i386.deb
gdc-4.2_0.25-4.2.
gdc-4.1_0.25-4.1.2-17exp2_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gdc-4.1_0.25-4.1.2-17exp2.dsc
gdc-4.1_0.25-4.1.2-17exp2.diff.gz
gdc-4.1_0.25-4.1.2-17exp2_alpha.deb
gdc-4.1_0.25-4.1.2-17exp2_amd64.deb
gdc-4.1_0.25-4.1.2-17exp2_hppa.deb
gdc-4.1_0.25-4.1.2-
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20071116-1
PR34122
> Automatic build of sqlitebrowser_1.3-2 on coconut0 by sbuild/ia64 0.53
...
> gcc -c -pipe -Wall -W -O2 -D_REENTRANT -DNDEBUG -DTHREAD_SAFE=1
> -DTEMP_STORE=2 -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -DQT_SHARED
> -DQT_TABLET_SUPPORT
Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:47:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#448293: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20071116-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447399: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20071116-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430957: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20071116-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:47:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#450122: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20071116-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447426: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20071116-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447398: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20071116-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447693: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20071116-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#448218: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20071116-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447599: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20071116-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447560: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20071116-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447645: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20071116-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:47:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#449303: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20071116-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447558: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20071116-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447696: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20071116-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#448217: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20071116-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447695: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20071116-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
--- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-16 20:01 ---
> Specification of the proposed new behaviour:
>
> 1. GCC should ignore unknown -Wno-* options if no other warnings are to
>be issued. This is always correct since the only effect of such an
>option would be t
Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20071116-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20071116-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20071116-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20071116-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20071116-1_amd64.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20071116-1_amd64.deb
gcc-snapsh
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 413400 20070916-1
Bug#413400: ICE: verify_ssa failed (definition in block 23 does not dominate
use in block 32)
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 20070916-1, send any further e
--
ismail at pardus dot org dot tr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ismail at pardus dot org dot
|
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 451538 + upstream
Bug#451538: ICE in get_addr_dereference_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:1746
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> forwarded 451538 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR34122
Bug#451538: ICE in get_addr_dereference_operands, at tree-ss
gcc-snapshot_20071116-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-snapshot_20071116-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20071116.orig.tar.gz
gcc-snapshot_20071116-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20071116-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-11-16 19:14 ---
This was introduced between 20070422 and 20070515.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34123
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone wh
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
||debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 439620 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR34123
Bug#439620: gcc-snapshot: ICE: verify_ssa failed with -ftree-loop-linear
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31037 to
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR34123.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
forwarded 439620 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR34123
thanks
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-26 10:22]:
> > md2.c:104: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
> Yeah, this is a known issue.
Nope, it's a different issue. T hanks a lot.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 439620 - fixed-upstream
Bug#439620: gcc-snapshot: ICE: verify_ssa failed with -ftree-loop-linear
Tags were: fixed-upstream
Tags removed: fixed-upstream
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2.2-3
Severity: important
Hi,
the attached patch adds fast-math support for hurd-i386 to gcc-4.2 to as
well, it's slightly rediffed from the one for gcc-4.1, as that one does
not apply cleanly.
Please apply, several packages (most notably mesa) FTBFS without it.
tha
close 413400 20070916-1
thanks
Volker Reichelt writes, "The testcase in comment #10 stopped crashing
for me between 2007-08-15 and 2007-09-14. It wanted to investigate
why, but never managed to. Seems to be fixed now."
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
40 matches
Mail list logo
