Now there's an option to make a crutial move in your life!
Start right ahead!WE now happy to introduce to you a tatally different option to acquire your qualification online!Whatever your specialization is now obtaining your diploma degree becomes a reality.
Lot's of people worldwide appreciated
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 446714 452451
Bug#446714: gcc-4.3: Fails to build a program which builds fine with gcc-4.1
Bug#452451: compilation of lmms:internal compiler error
Forcibly Merged 446714 452451.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 452451 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR34215
Bug#452451: compilation of lmms:internal compiler error
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR34215.
> tag 446714 - moreinfo
Bug#446714: gcc-4.3: Fails to build a program wh
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Oct 19 09:23:29 UTC 2007 (revision 129483)
Target: ia64-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.1.3 20071019 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-17)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: cd5014e
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2316
# of unexpected failures
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Aug 20 12:22:45 UTC 2007 (revision 127646)
Target: ia64-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.3.0 20071116 (experimental) [trunk revision 127646] (Debian
20071116-1)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: cxb3014
FAIL: cxb3016
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected pass
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Nov 23 09:48:37 UTC 2007 (revision 130369)
Target: sparc-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.2.3 20071123 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.2-4)
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/other/unused1.C scan-assembler
(strin
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
>> Falk Hueffner a écrit :
>>> Hi,
>> Hi,
>>
>>> I'd be willing to take a look if there is a small testcase (i.e. a
>>> single C file which when compiled and run will either succeed or
>>> fail). Anybody willing to create such a testcase?
>>>
>> I
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> Falk Hueffner a écrit :
>> Hi,
> Hi,
>
>> I'd be willing to take a look if there is a small testcase (i.e. a
>> single C file which when compiled and run will either succeed or
>> fail). Anybody willing to create such a testcase?
>>
>
> I have started to work on that, b
Falk Hueffner a écrit :
> Hi,
Hi,
> I'd be willing to take a look if there is a small testcase (i.e. a
> single C file which when compiled and run will either succeed or
> fail). Anybody willing to create such a testcase?
>
I have started to work on that, but unfortunately I haven't found time
t
Hi,
I'd be willing to take a look if there is a small testcase (i.e. a
single C file which when compiled and run will either succeed or
fail). Anybody willing to create such a testcase?
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status rep
Your message dated Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:17:18 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447969: fixed in gcc-4.3 4.3-20071124-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.2
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report f
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.2
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #451757
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR34150
# * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED
usertags 451757 + statu
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.2
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #441633
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33848
# * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED
# * remote resolutio
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #447710
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33869
# * remote status changed: UNCONFIRMED -> RESOLVED
# * remote r
Accepted:
cpp-4.3-doc_4.3-20071124-1_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.3/cpp-4.3-doc_4.3-20071124-1_all.deb
cpp-4.3_4.3-20071124-1_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.3/cpp-4.3_4.3-20071124-1_sparc.deb
fixincludes_4.3-20071124-1_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.3/fixincludes_4.3-20071124-1_sparc.deb
g++
Your message dated Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#434937: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447969: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452108: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#451520: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Accepted:
cpp-4.2-doc_4.2.2-4_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.2/cpp-4.2-doc_4.2.2-4_all.deb
cpp-4.2_4.2.2-4_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.2/cpp-4.2_4.2.2-4_sparc.deb
fixincludes_4.2.2-4_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.2/fixincludes_4.2.2-4_sparc.deb
g++-4.2-multilib_4.2.2-4_sparc.deb
to pool/
gcc-4.3_4.3-20071124-1_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.3_4.3-20071124-1.dsc
gcc-4.3_4.3-20071124.orig.tar.gz
gcc-4.3_4.3-20071124-1.diff.gz
gcc-4.3-source_4.3-20071124-1_all.deb
cpp-4.3-doc_4.3-20071124-1_all.deb
libgcj9-jar_4.3-20071124-1_al
Sources can be downloaded from:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/lmms/lmms-0.3.1.tar.bz2
--
Atomo64 - Raphael
Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
gcc-4.2_4.2.2-4_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.2_4.2.2-4.dsc
gcc-4.2_4.2.2-4.diff.gz
gcc-4.2-source_4.2.2-4_all.deb
cpp-4.2-doc_4.2.2-4_all.deb
libstdc++6-4.2-doc_4.2.2-4_all.deb
gfortran-4.2-doc_4.2.2-4_all.deb
gcc-4.2-doc_4.2.2-4_all.deb
Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2.2-3
Severity: important
Hello,
gcc-4.2 (and others) dies building sks-ecc[0] on powerpc in the
following situations.
GCC Opt -funroll-loops Result
4.1 O2 YesOK
4.2 O2 YesICE
4.2 O1 YesICE
4.2 O0 Yes
Package: gdc-4.2
Version: 0.25-4.2.2-3d1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source.
| Automatic build of gdc-4.2_0.25-4.2.2-3d1 on digitalis by sbuild/alpha 98-farm
| Build started at 20071125-0806
Package: gcc
Version: 3.3
hello,
gcc is included in sarge but i must use "apt-get" to update... "apt-get
update/upgrade" does nothing :-(
---
Sébastien WILLEMIJNS
Package: gcc
Version: 3.3
hello,
gcc is included in sarge but i must use "apt-get" to update... "apt-get
update/upgrade" does nothing :-(
---
Sébastien WILLEMIJNS
29 matches
Mail list logo
