--
vapier at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toolchain at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-05 22:29 ---
What does the full cse1 dump look like at that point (don't forget to call
fflush(dump_file) from gdb ;-) Is this reproducible with a cross-compiler?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31944
---
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-05 21:51 ---
Let's ask the Steven-o-racle ;)
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfi
--- Comment #16 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-12-05
19:01 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at
postreload.c:392
> You should request a secondary reload when you need one, like on the SPARC.
> Currently the only return value o
--- Comment #15 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-05 17:42
---
> 2) pa_secondary_reload() requests a secondary scratch register reload for
> essentially everything when CLASS is FP_REGS. However, reload is treating
> this reload as optional, resulting in spill failures and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # My princeton.edu email address will expire soon
> # Changing submitter to my debian.org address
> submitter 396496 !
Bug#396496: Problems upgrading sarge -> etch
Changed Bug submitter from "Kevin B McCarty ([EMAIL PROTECTED])" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> to
--- Comment #14 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-05 17:19
---
The regression was introduced by the following change:
2005-11-21 Jan Hubicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR tree-optimization/24653
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (ccp_fold): Strip down useless conversions.
I have
Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2.2-4
debian/copyright claims that GCC is licenses under GPLv2 even though
most of the code has been moved to GPLv3 with 4.2.2. (Files that have
exception clauses are still at GPLv2.)
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Your message dated Wed, 5 Dec 2007 09:56:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452110: gcc-4.2 generates bad code on alpha
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
12 matches
Mail list logo