[Bug rtl-optimization/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

--- Comment #101 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-24 04:51 --- *** Bug 34951 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/34951] gcse+O1 triggers invalid floating point stack management

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-24 04:51 --- Actually no this is not really a "bug" in GCC, just your assumption about x87 fp math. Anyways this is duplicate of bug 323. Adding -ffloat-store fixes the issue. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 323

Bug#462342: ICE in svn boost math toolkit

Package: gcc Version: 4:4.2.1-6 Severity: normal Details at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34950 --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.6.23 Debian Release: lenny/sid 990 testing ftp.us.debian.org 500 unstableftp.us.debian.org 50

Bug#427907: Bug#426302: Please recheck with gcc-4.3/gcc-snapshot

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 05:24:07PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > tag 427907 + moreinfo > thanks > > Please recheck with gcc-4.3/gcc-snapshot Still reproducible with newest gcc-4.3. gcc-snapshot seems to be older than gcc-4.3 currently, so not tested with that, yet. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenhe

Re: proposal of release goal: buildability with future gcc versions

Matthias Klose writes: > Newer GCC versions are more strict and usually cause build failures > for older or untouched code. A list of packages which currently fail > with GCC-4.2 can be found at [1], the same list for GCC-4.3 at [2]. > > To reduce the amount of build failures early and to ease tra

tagging cross-gcc related bug reports

For gcc-4.1 I did start tagging all cross build related bug reports; please find them at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=cross-gcc;[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd appreciate if somebody could do the same for the other GCC versions, and then provide fixes for all these reports (updated to

[Bug tree-optimization/33826] [4.1/4.2 Regression] GCC generates wrong code for infinitely recursive functions

--- Comment #20 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-23 21:35 --- Not fixed on the branches. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Processed: work on GCC-4.1 bug reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 416326 + pending fixed-upstream Bug#416326: gcj 4.1 ICE when using `--coverage' Tags were: fixed-upstream Tags added: pending, fixed-upstream > reassign 422569 gcj-4.3 Bug#422569: gcj-4.1: gcj debug info emits "line 0" Bug reassigned from package `

[Bug libgcj/31700] [JNI] -X options not recognised by JNI_CreateJavaVM

--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-23 17:59 --- Fix checked in a while ago. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Bug#448480: marked as done (GCC miscompilation on ARM)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:48:39 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#448480: I've just realised that ... has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#176064: marked as done (gcc-3.2: Provide a way to build cpu-specific versions )

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:43:11 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Provide a way to build cpu-specific versions has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#377210: Re[3]: libstdc++6-4.1: std::basic_file::seekoff works incorrect

Sergey Nivarov writes: > > Matthias Klose writes: > > > > there is no g++-4.2 in etch; just create a chroot and install sid into > > the chroot. > > > > Thanks. Nothing changed. Still same problem. > I made my own investigation and made a small class which fixes the problem: > > template > >

Bug#454647: Compiling kernel 2.6.23-1 results in Internal Compiler Error

tag 454647 + moreinfo thanks Mika Rastas writes: > CC [M] drivers/media/video/cpia.o > drivers/media/video/cpia.c: In function 'fetch_frame': > drivers/media/video/cpia.c:2961: internal compiler error: Segmentation > fault > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropr

Bug#352859: marked as done (cpp: -iquote behaves wrong but -I- still works correct)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:19:07 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#352859: cpp: -iquote behaves wrong but -I- still works correct has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Processed: Re: Bug#352859: cpp: -iquote behaves wrong but -I- still works correct

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 352859 + wontfix Bug#352859: cpp: -iquote behaves wrong but -I- still works correct There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#435907: gcc-4.1: Empty ; causes programs built with profiling to hang

tag 435907 + moreinfo thanks Michael Casadevall,,, writes: > Package: gcc-4.1 > Version: 4.1.2-13 > Severity: important > > Discovered by running configure, any empty lines with just a ; will > cause an endless loop. I attempted to debug with gdb, but that crashed > to. I've included a test fil

Bug#412137: marked as done (g++-4.1: On one machine g++ fails to compile programs, even though all dependencies are met)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:58:38 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#412137: The problem "solved" in a dirty way has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Processed: Re: Bug#435907: gcc-4.1: Empty ; causes programs built with profiling to hang

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 435907 + moreinfo Bug#435907: gcc-4.1: Empty ; causes programs built with profiling to hang There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admin

Bug#355621: hidden symbol `__gcov_init' is referenced by DSO

Andrea, would it be possible to forward this report upstream yourself, with a self-contained testcase? Thanks, Matthias A Mennucc writes: > tags 355621 - moreinfo > thanks > > hi > > I tried with > $ gcc --version > gcc (Debian 20070916-1) 4.3.0 20070916 (experimental) [trunk revision 128522] >

[Bug driver/34942] -frepo only works with C locale

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

Bug#426302: Please recheck with gcc-4.3/gcc-snapshot

tag 427907 + moreinfo thanks Please recheck with gcc-4.3/gcc-snapshot -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#443767: libstdc++6-4.1-dev: libstdc++-dev doesn't need to depend on g++; recommend or suggest is sufficient

Hi Matthias, Matthias Klose wrote: won't change that. Would you like to explain why? Regards, Phil. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#443767: libstdc++6-4.1-dev: libstdc++-dev doesn't need to depend on g++; recommend or suggest is sufficient

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 443767 + wontfix Bug#443767: libstdc++6-4.1-dev: libstdc++-dev doesn't need to depend on g++; recommend or suggest is sufficient There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistan

Bug#443767: marked as done (libstdc++6-4.1-dev: libstdc++-dev doesn't need to depend on g++; recommend or suggest is sufficient)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:10:35 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#443767: libstdc++6-4.1-dev: libstdc++-dev doesn't need to depend on g++; recommend or suggest is sufficient has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#406442: Incorrect SSE2 code generated for vector initialization by cast from non-constant array

Geoffrey Reynolds writes: > > please recheck with gcc-4.2 gcc-4.3/gcc-snapshot > > This bug is present in the following packages: > Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.3-3 > Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-21 > > It is NOT present in the following packages: > Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 3.3.6-13

Bug#446857: marked as done (can't build qgis on arm)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:03:16 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing as invalid, likely to be a hardware problem has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Bug#423156: marked as done (ext/codecvt_specializations.h is not -Wall clean)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:26:31 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ext/codecvt_specializations.h is not -Wall clean has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Processed: Re: binaries created on sid generate "floating point error" on etch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 421737 + unreproducible Bug#421737: gcc-4.1: binaries created on sid generate "floating point error" on etch Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug t

Bug#421737: marked as done (gcc-4.1: binaries created on sid generate "floating point error" on etch)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:28:45 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line binaries created on sid generate "floating point error" on etch has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Processed: Re: ext/codecvt_specializations.h is not -Wall clean

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 423156 + unreproducible Bug#423156: ext/codecvt_specializations.h is not -Wall clean Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Processed: Re: Bug#358076: ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 358076 + wontfix Bug#358076: g++-4.0: fails to locate std C++ headers (eg, typeinfo) Tags were: wontfix unreproducible Tags added: wontfix > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adm

Bug#358076: marked as done (g++-4.0: fails to locate std C++ headers (eg, typeinfo))

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:21:45 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#358076: ... has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#389555: marked as done (g++-4.1: Adds un-needed libraries during link)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:16:57 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line g++-4.1: Adds un-needed libraries during link has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: Re: g++-4.1: Adds un-needed libraries during link

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 389555 + upstream Bug#389555: g++-4.1: Adds un-needed libraries during link There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > tag 389555 + wontfix Bug#389555: g++-4.1: Adds un-needed libraries during link Tags were: upstream Tags added: wontfix > tha

Bug#438641: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s

tag 438641 + moreinfo reassign 438641 gcc thanks please recheck with gcc-4.3 and provide a use case for the request (using libtool and explicitely specifying -lgcc? why?) =?UTF-8?Q?Lo=C3=AFc?= Minier writes: > Package: gcc-4.1 > Version: 4.1.2-15 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > I'm tryi

Processed: Re: Bug#438641: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 438641 + moreinfo Bug#438641: gcc does not permit mixing -shared and -static objects when linking (or: please pass -static-libgcc automatically) There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > reassign 438641 gcc Bug#438641: gcc does not permit mix

Bug#440287: #440287: [fixed in 4.3, hppa] endless loop while trying to compile 2.6.23-rc4

tag 440287 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with current gcc-4.2 from unstable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#395533: marked as done (ICE: s390_expand_setmem, at config/s390/s390.c:3559)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:25:57 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ICE: s390_expand_setmem, at config/s390/s390.c:3559 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Processed: Re: #440287: [fixed in 4.3, hppa] endless loop while trying to compile 2.6.23-rc4

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 440287 + moreinfo Bug#440287: [fixed in 4.3, hppa] endless loop while trying to compile 2.6.23-rc4 Tags were: upstream fixed-upstream Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tra

Bug#453072: gcj-4.2: Java processes are memory hogs on amd64

On Wednesday 23 January 2008 06:48:54 am Matthias Klose wrote: > tag 453072 + moreinfo > thanks > > please recheck with gcj-4.3. That's going to be difficult, since glibc has a patch applied to work around the bug. -- Daniel Schepler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subje

Processed: closing 446218

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.12 > close 446218 4.3-20071124-1 Bug#446218: libgcc1-dbg: dependency on libgcc1 lacks epoch 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in

Processed: Re: Bug#462241: libgcc1-arm-cross: not installable -- broken for over a week

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 462241 gcc-4.1 Bug#462241: libgcc1-arm-cross: not installable -- broken for over a week Warning: Unknown package 'libgcc1-arm-cross' Bug reassigned from package `libgcc1-arm-cross' to `gcc-4.1'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact m

Bug#453072: gcj-4.2: Java processes are memory hogs on amd64

tag 453072 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with gcj-4.3. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: gcj-4.2: Java processes are memory hogs on amd64

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 453072 + moreinfo Bug#453072: gcj-4.2: Java processes are memory hogs on amd64 There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adm

Bug#432191: hangs OOo on ppc

still missing more information; please check with gij-4.3/gcj-4.3 instead. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#350772: marked as done (libgcj6-dev: test program for regex bug)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:37:50 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line static libgcj not provided by current gcj packages. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Processed: static libgcj not provided by current gcj packages.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 327411 + wontfix Bug#327411: libgcj6-dev: execution of java program compiled with --static fails in gnu.regexp init There were no tags set. Bug#350772: libgcj6-dev: test program for regex bug Tags added: wontfix > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#453125: marked as done (Please add package gij to Depends)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:42:33 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#453125: Please add package gij to Depends has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#327411: marked as done (libgcj6-dev: execution of java program compiled with --static fails in gnu.regexp init)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:37:50 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line static libgcj not provided by current gcj packages. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

[Bug libgcj/14759] ServerSocketChannel causes Selector.select() to return immediatly

--- Comment #6 from konqueror at gmx dot de 2008-01-23 10:43 --- Give back. -- konqueror at gmx dot de changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|konqueror at gmx do

Bug#330741: marked as done (gcj-4.0: ICE in first_insn_after_basic_block_note on HPPA)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:27:02 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ICE in first_insn_after_basic_block_note on HPPA has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case