Results for 4.3.1 (Debian 4.3.1-2) libjava testsuite on m68k-unknown-linux-gnu

2008-06-25 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_3_1_release revision 136481 Target: m68k-linux-gnu gcc version 4.3.1 (Debian 4.3.1-2) Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu === libjava tests === Running target unix FAIL: Process_3 output - source compiled test FAIL: Process

Results for 4.1.3 20080623 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-23) testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

2008-06-25 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Jun 23 21:22:23 UTC 2008 (revision 137048) Target: sparc-linux-gnu gcc version 4.1.3 20080623 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-23) Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution te

Results for 4.1.3 20080623 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-23) testsuite on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu

2008-06-25 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Jun 23 21:22:23 UTC 2008 (revision 137048) Target: ia64-linux-gnu gcc version 4.1.3 20080623 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-23) Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test

Results for 4.1.3 20080623 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-23) testsuite on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu

2008-06-25 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Jun 23 21:22:23 UTC 2008 (revision 137048) Target: hppa-linux-gnu gcc version 4.1.3 20080623 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-23) Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test

Bug#369064: Patch already in deb but deactivated

2008-06-25 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Goswin von Brederlow writes: >> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Goswin von Brederlow writes: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I believe the gcc source already has a patch for multiarch include and >> >> library >> >> directories but they are

[Bug target/35659] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Miscompiled code with -O2 (but not with -O2 -funroll-loops) on ia64

2008-06-25 Thread doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de
--- Comment #17 from doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2008-06-25 22:16 --- Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 Regression] Miscompiled code with -O2 (but not with -O2 -funroll-loops) on ia64 mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org writes: > Anyway, can you help me reproduce the issue, so I can take a close

[Bug target/35659] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Miscompiled code with -O2 (but not with -O2 -funroll-loops) on ia64

2008-06-25 Thread mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-25 21:33 --- I can't reproduce the error with today mainline. When I put in one file 'PROGRAM PR35659' and 'SUBROUTINE TLSC (A,B,AUX,IPIV,EPS,X)' and compile it with any optimization level I get the same "STOP 0" message. A

[Bug target/35659] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Miscompiled code with -O2 (but not with -O2 -funroll-loops) on ia64

2008-06-25 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-25 11:32 --- Wrong-code bug on secondary arch. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/35659] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Miscompiled code with -O2 (but not with -O2 -funroll-loops) on ia64

2008-06-25 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-25 11:31 --- I have no idea why is speculation even attempted here (it doesn't make any sense, the pointer is surely non-NULL, it points to a global variable), and apparently nothing checks whether it is safe to move over the spec

[Bug target/35659] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Miscompiled code with -O2 (but not with -O2 -funroll-loops) on ia64

2008-06-25 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-25 10:20 --- And the miscompiled tlsc.f inline (compile with just -O2): SUBROUTINE TLSC (A,B,AUX,IPIV,EPS,X) COMMON /TLSDIM/ M1,M,N,L,IER COMMON /SLATE/ BETA,H,I,IB,IB1,ID,ID1,IEND,II,IST,J,JA,JB,JK +