Results for 4.4.0 20081117 (experimental) [trunk revision 141948] (Debian 20081117-1) testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Mon Nov 17 20:25:34 UTC 2008 (revision 141948) Target: x86_64-linux-gnu gcc version 4.4.0 20081117 (experimental) [trunk revision 141948] (Debian 20081117-1) === acats tests === === acats Summary === # of expected passes2315 # of unexpe

Results for 4.3.3 20081117 (prerelease) (Debian 4.3.2-2~exp3) testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Mon Nov 17 20:41:17 UTC 2008 (revision 141948) Target: sparc-linux-gnu gcc version 4.3.3 20081117 (prerelease) (Debian 4.3.2-2~exp3) Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/opt/anchor1.C execution test

Results for 4.3.3 20081117 (prerelease) (Debian 4.3.2-2~exp3) testsuite on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Mon Nov 17 20:41:17 UTC 2008 (revision 141948) Target: hppa-linux-gnu gcc version 4.3.3 20081117 (prerelease) (Debian 4.3.2-2~exp3) Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix === g++ Summary === # of expe

Bug#506331: g++-4.3: Misleading warning claims to ignore spurious qualifiers on return type

Package: g++-4.3 Version: 4.3.2-1 Severity: minor Put the following ridiculous code in a .cpp file: struct Base { virtual const int stupid() = 0; }; struct Derived : public Base { virtual int stupid() { return 1; } }; and run the compiler on it, with warnings. I get: $ g++ -O2 -Wall -Wextra