gcj-4.3_4.3.3-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2009-01-30 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: gappletviewer-4.3_4.3.3-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.3/gappletviewer-4.3_4.3.3-3_i386.deb gcj-4.3-base_4.3.3-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.3/gcj-4.3-base_4.3.3-3_i386.deb gcj-4.3_4.3.3-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcj-4.3/gcj-4.3_4.3.3-3.diff.gz gcj-4.3_4.3.3-3.dsc to pool/main/

Processing of gcj-4.3_4.3.3-3_i386.changes

2009-01-30 Thread Archive Administrator
gcj-4.3_4.3.3-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcj-4.3_4.3.3-3.dsc gcj-4.3_4.3.3-3.diff.gz libgcj9-jar_4.3.3-3_all.deb libgcj9-src_4.3.3-3_all.deb libgcj-doc_4.3.3-3_all.deb gcj-4.3-base_4.3.3-3_i386.deb gij-4.3_4.3.3-3_i386.deb libgcj9-0_4.3.3

Processed: Small example to reproduce the bug

2009-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 491137 4.3.3-1 Bug#491137: [g++/s390 only] optimization causes errornous behavior Bug marked as found in version 4.3.3-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrato

Bug#491137: Small example to reproduce the bug

2009-01-30 Thread Michael Tautschnig
found 491137 4.3.3-1 thanks Finally I got around to produce a tiny example from the original code that reproduces the bug. The attached code contains several notes on which parts seem to be essential (e.g., using ::std::string in some way). To reproduce do g++ -g -O2 -o invariance_annotation inva

Results for 4.4.0 20090129 (experimental) [trunk revision 143770] (Debian 20090129-1) testsuite on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu

2009-01-30 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Jan 29 21:41:46 UTC 2009 (revision 143770) Target: powerpc-linux-gnu gcc version 4.4.0 20090129 (experimental) [trunk revision 143770] (Debian 20090129-1) === acats tests === === acats Summary === # of expected passes2315 # of unexp

Results for 4.4.0 20090129 (experimental) [trunk revision 143770] (Debian 20090129-1) testsuite on i486-pc-linux-gnu

2009-01-30 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Jan 29 21:41:46 UTC 2009 (revision 143770) Target: i486-linux-gnu gcc version 4.4.0 20090129 (experimental) [trunk revision 143770] (Debian 20090129-1) === acats tests === === acats Summary === # of expected passes2315 # of unexpect

Results for 4.3.3 (Debian 4.3.3-3) testsuite on alpha-unknown-linux-gnu

2009-01-30 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jan 27 22:35:18 UTC 2009 (revision 143701) Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu === libgomp tests === Running target unix WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: libgomp.c/autopar-1.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.fortran/threadprivate3.f90 -O3 -fomit-fram

[Bug middle-end/39015] [4.3/4.4 regression] wrong code building libgsf

2009-01-30 Thread jdassen at debian dot org
--- Comment #17 from jdassen at debian dot org 2009-01-30 17:02 --- Now fixed in libgsf upstream: http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/libgsf?view=revision&revision=1039 Thank you very much! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39015 --- You are receiving this mail be

Processed: reopening and reassigning gcc report to libgsf

2009-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 513420 -1 Bug#513420: Breaks building libgsf from source Bug 513420 cloned as bug 513594. > reopen -1 Bug#513594: Breaks building libgsf from source 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to us

[Bug middle-end/39015] [4.3/4.4 regression] wrong code building libgsf

2009-01-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-30 11:40 --- Invalid. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/39015] [4.3/4.4 regression] wrong code building libgsf

2009-01-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-30 11:39 --- Created an attachment (id=17213) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17213&action=view) libgsf-enum-register.patch Patch that fixes this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39015 ---

[Bug middle-end/39015] [4.3/4.4 regression] wrong code building libgsf

2009-01-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-30 11:38 --- And clearly the bug is in libgsf, not in gcc. g_enum_register_static documentation says: GObject keeps a reference to the data, so it cannot be stack-allocated. so this relies on this optimization. gsf_output_csv_quo

[Bug middle-end/39015] [4.3/4.4 regression] wrong code building libgsf

2009-01-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-30 10:58 --- Nothing changed in gsf-scan.c, but out of the 3 objects in libgsf.so that changed it seems to be gsf-output-csv.c where r143570 makes difference for gsf-scan. Looking at it now... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/

gcc-snapshot_20090129-1_multi.changes ACCEPTED

2009-01-30 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: gcc-snapshot_20090129-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20090129-1.diff.gz gcc-snapshot_20090129-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20090129-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20090129-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20090129-1_i386.deb gcc-snapshot

Processing of gcc-snapshot_20090129-1_multi.changes

2009-01-30 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-snapshot_20090129-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-snapshot_20090129-1_i386.deb gcc-snapshot_20090129.orig.tar.gz gcc-snapshot_20090129-1_powerpc.deb gcc-snapshot_20090129-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20090129-1.diff.gz Greetings, Your Debia