Hi,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:19:22PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > It seems the kernel will not be happy if the stack protector is switched
> > > > on unconditionally:
> > > >
> > > > http://osdir.com/ml/linux-kernel/2009-10/msg07064.h
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > It seems the kernel will not be happy if the stack protector is switched
> > > on unconditionally:
> > >
> > > http://osdir.com/ml/linux-kernel/2009-10/msg07064.html
> >
> > Indeed. The kernel build system needs to be able to command whether
> > stackp
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 09:41:59PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Ever thought about integrating PaX [0] per default in Debian?
What features does the grsecurity patch provide currently? I know that
several of the mentioned PaX features are supported in vanilla kernel in
the meantime:
-
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 09:32 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Any idea if these patches will be merged upstream?
It's probably quite unlikely,... although I never understood why,..
Even though it's available for some architectures,.. it would improve
security at least on them.
Cheers,
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 01:30:12PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:14:25AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 11:55:25AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > I would like to propose enabling[1
Kees Cook, le Tue 27 Oct 2009 14:11:43 -0700, a écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:14:25AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 11:55:25AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > I would like to propose enabling[1] the GCC hardening patches that Ubuntu
> > > uses[2].
> >
> > How do they
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:14:25AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 11:55:25AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > I would like to propose enabling[1] the GCC hardening patches that Ubuntu
> > uses[2].
>
> How do they work? Do they also change the free-standing compiler or only
> the
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_4_2_release revision 152840
Target: i486-kfreebsd-gnu
gcc version 4.4.2 (Debian 4.4.2-1)
Native configuration is i486-pc-kfreebsd-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary for unix ===
# of expected p
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_4_2_release revision 152840
Target: x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu
gcc version 4.4.2 (Debian 4.4.2-1)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary for unix ===
# of expect
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:14:25AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 11:55:25AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > I would like to propose enabling[1] the GCC hardening patches that Ubuntu
> > > uses[2].
> >
> > How do they work? Do they
--- Comment #13 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-27 14:58 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> when binutils 2.20 branch is built with gcc-4.4 branch or trunk, I see the
> following test failures in the ld testsuite. Checked with gcc-4.4 from
> debian/testing, debian/unstable and ubu
I have removed gnat from the gcc-defaults package in Subversion
and prepared a new gnat source package, per [1]. Could you please
upload gcc-defaults to unstable? Alternatively, if you give mee
the green light I can upload myself.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2009/10/msg00030.html
--
12 matches
Mail list logo
