Hello,
On ketvirtadienis 28 Sausis 2010 21:37:15 Riku Voipio wrote:
> Brilliant! This shall be the plan then:
>
> 1) identify affected libraries (Jakubs list as base?)
> 2) provide patches for the libraries and submit them to BTS
> 3) give maintainers X days to MU the libraries, after that procee
Modestas Vainius wrote:
I have recently came across .symver directive [1][2] that is more
straightforward way to achieve the same thing. In that case, only source file
(.cpp) needs to be changed.
Brilliant! This shall be the plan then:
1) identify affected libraries (Jakubs list as base?)
2
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
sapwo od align ing belly achin g subdi stric t demag netiz es previ
siona ry infor mal venom isati on terro riser bicyc led herdl ike
ridic ulous ly mynah mynah mouse trap adjus ting frate rnity mailc
oach digit izing stann aries daiqu iris congr egate s jowl tande
mise natu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 566514 java-gcj-compat
Bug #566514 [gcj-jre-headless] gcc-defaults makes java-gcj-compat-headless
uninstallable
Bug reassigned from package 'gcj-jre-headless' to 'java-gcj-compat'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions gcc-defaults/1
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 27.01.2010 23:26, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >>- did you consider building the udeb from a separate source
> >> package, build-depending on gcc-4.4-source?
> >
> > No, I had not consider
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:47:55PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > There is a major problem with gcc 4.4 and armel - the ABI of va_list
> > changed (for c++ libraries). We need to decide one of the following:
>
> What exactly have changed? The ABI
--- Comment #7 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-28 12:30 ---
Fixed in trunk.
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSI
--- Comment #4 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-28 12:30 ---
Subject: Bug 42820
Author: dodji
Date: Thu Jan 28 12:29:52 2010
New Revision: 156316
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156316
Log:
Fix PR c++/42713
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/42713
On 27.01.2010 23:26, Frans Pop wrote:
Thanks a lot for the quick reply.
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
The patch itself looks ok, some other questions:
- did you consider building the udeb from a separate source package,
build-depending on gcc-4.4-source?
No, I h
--- Comment #6 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-28 12:30 ---
Subject: Bug 42713
Author: dodji
Date: Thu Jan 28 12:29:52 2010
New Revision: 156316
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156316
Log:
Fix PR c++/42713
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/42713
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 373253 by 567182
Bug #373253 [debian-installer] "libgcc_s.so.1 on AMD64 and PowerPC should be
provided
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 373253: 567182
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
* Matthias Klose , 2010-01-27, 23:25:
IMO the major work is to identify affected libraries. if this is
done, you can decide if binNMUs or manual creation of aliases is the
bigger pain.
On some other architectures (like amd64) std::va_list is already mangled
to something easily greppable. This
Hello,
On ketvirtadienis 28 Sausis 2010 10:23:20 Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > Interesting. Do you have a example on howto do that?
>
> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-kde/qt4-x11.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/92_arm
> el_gcc43_valist_compat.diff;h=1db
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Interesting. Do you have a example on howto do that?
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-kde/qt4-x11.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/92_armel_gcc43_valist_compat.diff;h=1db7aa33b73193a8ac0ff563f7a81bff40bfab61;hb=b3e8073df9201386aa420d5f4cab839615a0c6c5
15 matches
Mail list logo
