[Bug libgcj/40860] [4.4/4.5 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux

2010-03-17 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Comment #22 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-03-17 21:23 --- I did another binutils experiment. I reverted my patch to disable general merging of table entries, and instead disabled generating new and merging cantunwind entries. With that binutils libjava regressed just like with

[Bug libgcj/40860] [4.4/4.5 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux

2010-03-17 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Comment #21 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-03-17 21:13 --- (In reply to comment #20) > no change in the libjava testsuite when built with these binutils But that's still thumb not arm like in comment #16? All my results are from plain arm (armv5tel) builds. -- http://gcc.g

[Bug libgcj/40860] [4.4/4.5 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux

2010-03-17 Thread doko at ubuntu dot com
--- Comment #20 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-03-17 10:51 --- no change in the libjava testsuite when built with these binutils -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40860 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the rep