(-cc: Lucas)
Matthias Klose wrote:
> fyi, here is a partial rebuild with gcc-4.6 without the work around applied:
Thanks. For reference, the simplest way I could find to just download
the files that matter is
wget -r -l 1 -H -Dlaunchpad.net -A gz
http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ft
The failure on kfreebsd-i386 is a different one:
make[4]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make[4]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-gcc-4.6_4.6-20110227-1-kfreebsd-i386-oLsZOn/gcc-4.6-4.6-20110227/build/i486-kfreebsd-gnu/libstdc++-v3'
make[3]
On 28.02.2011 03:48, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> this would require the build logs of all the *sucessful* builds from this
>> rebuild.
>
> Indeed, "grep -F '[-Wunused-but-set'" does not dig up anything.
fyi, here is a partial rebuild with gcc-4.6 without the work around
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Feb 22 23:10:25 UTC 2011 (revision 170417)
Target: mips-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.5.2 (Debian 4.5.2-4)
Native configuration is mips-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/packed1.C (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: attribute_
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Feb 27 21:33:50 UTC 2011 (revision 170549)
Target: i486-kfreebsd-gnu
gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-13)
Native configuration is i486-pc-kfreebsd-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Feb 27 21:33:50 UTC 2011 (revision 170549)
Target: i486-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-13)
Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Feb 27 21:33:50 UTC 2011 (revision 170549)
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-13)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gnat-4.4
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #614402 (http://bugs.debian.org/614402)
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR47818
# * remote s
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 564974 + sid wheezy
Bug #564974 [cyphesis-cpp] cyphesis-cpp: ftbfs with gcc-4.5
Added tag(s) wheezy.
> tag 565026 + sid wheezy
Bug #565026 [libfreebob] libfreebob: ftbfs with gcc-4.5
Added tag(s) wheezy.
> tag 565051 + sid wheezy
Bug #565051 [
The failure on kfreebsd-amd64 seems be due to incomplete config.gcc
after recent cleanup.
The config.gcc for kfreebsd-i386 does not have this problem,
but the build log is not shown on buildd.d.o.
Petr
--- src/gcc/config.gcc
+++ src/gcc/config.gcc
@@ -1293,7 +1293,7 @@
case ${target} i
On 28.02.2011 12:49, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Matthias Klose (28/02/2011):
>> wasn't built before.
>
> strictly speaking, yes. But since we're talking about a gcc package,
> that *could* be considered as a regression from previous versions… But
> what a hairy reasoning!
maybe, but then, it's an
Matthias Klose (28/02/2011):
> severity 615827 important
> thanks
For an out-of-date package? I don't think so.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Matthias Klose (28/02/2011):
> wasn't built before.
strictly speaking, yes. But since we're talking about a gcc package,
that *could* be considered as a regression from previous versions… But
what a hairy reasoning!
> It would better help to send a fix.
That's why I put debian-bsd@ in copy…
Ki
Hi,
sorry, ignore my last mail, it's still present in 4.5.2-4.
Cheers,
Stefan.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 615827 important
Bug #615827 [src:gcc-4.6] gcc-4.6: FTBFS on powerpc:
src/libgo/go/unicode/letter.go:176:1: internal compiler error
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 615826 important
Bug #615826 [src:gcc-4.6] gcc-4.6: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: os_dep.c:20:30: fatal
error: linux/version.h: No such file or directory
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
severity 615826 important
thanks
On 28.02.2011 11:21, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Source: gcc-4.6
> Version: 4.6-20110227-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: kfreebsd
>
> Hi,
>
> your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-* with:
> | /bin/bash ./libtool
severity 615827 important
thanks
On 28.02.2011 11:28, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Source: gcc-4.6
> Version: 4.6-20110227-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
>
> Hi,
>
> your package no longer builds on powerpc:
> | /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile
> /build/buildd-gcc-4.6_4.
Source: gcc-4.6
Version: 4.6-20110227-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
your package no longer builds on powerpc:
| /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile
/build/buildd-gcc-4.6_4.6-20110227-1-powerpc-ayygDJ/gcc-4.6-4.6-20110227/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/build/buildd-gcc-4.6_4.6-20
Source: gcc-4.6
Version: 4.6-20110227-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-* with:
| /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile
/build/buildd-gcc-4.6_4.6-20110227-1-kfreebsd-amd64-qdxe8p/gcc-4.6-4.6-2
On 27/02/11 at 20:48 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > this would require the build logs of all the *sucessful* builds from this
> > rebuild.
>
> Indeed, "grep -F '[-Wunused-but-set'" does not dig up anything.
After the rebuild, I did grep for that on all logs, but did
21 matches
Mail list logo
