> I would prefer if that would be tractable by an upstream report. I
> currently can't see any connection about the upstream commit and the
> debian report :-/
The commit adds a regression test which exhibits the exact same behaviour
as the test case I've sent you. It compiles fine without -std=c+
On 07/09/2011 10:05 PM, Matthias Berndt wrote:
> I mailed Jason Merrill about this, as he wrote the patch that broke it. He
> told me he fixed it in revision 176087 of the 4.6 branch. Could you package
> that fix?
I would prefer if that would be tractable by an upstream report. I currently
can't
Hi,
I mailed Jason Merrill about this, as he wrote the patch that broke it. He
told me he fixed it in revision 176087 of the 4.6 branch. Could you package
that fix?
Cheers
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Package: g++-4.6
Version: 4.6.1-2
Followup-For: Bug #632938
Hi,
I wrote Jason Merrill about this, and he told me that it was fixed in the 4.6
branch in revision 176087.
Cheers
Matthias
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Arc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49690
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-09
18:11:42 UTC ---
Draft patch.
As both integer arguments and function-pointer arguments are pointers, using a
generic "void *" (BT_VOID) is the simplest. A more cumbersome alternative would
be to split
Accepted:
cpp_4.6.1-2_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.6.1-2_amd64.deb
g++-multilib_4.6.1-2_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcc-defaults/g++-multilib_4.6.1-2_amd64.deb
g++_4.6.1-2_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_4.6.1-2_amd64.deb
gcc-defaults_1.107.dsc
to main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc-defaults_
gcc-defaults_1.107_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-defaults_1.107.dsc
gcc-defaults_1.107.tar.gz
libgcj-common_4.4.6-2_all.deb
cpp_4.6.1-2_amd64.deb
gcc_4.6.1-2_amd64.deb
gcc-multilib_4.6.1-2_amd64.deb
gdc_4.4.6-2_amd64.deb
g++_4.6.1-2_amd64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49690
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
Your message dated Sat, 09 Jul 2011 17:47:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#633359: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.107
has caused the Debian Bug report #633359,
regarding gcc-defaults: some dissonance
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Package: libppl-swi
Version: 0.11.2-3
Severity: normal
User: codeh...@debian.org
Usertags: la-file-removal
To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be either
Source: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.106
Three things I noticed in 1.105 which were not yet fixed
in 1.106 – the second one must be addressed in another
upload before I can build this on m68k; the third one is
an FTBFS fix I could work around (but since we require
an upload due to the second issue anyw
Accepted:
cpp_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb
g++-multilib_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcc-defaults/g++-multilib_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb
g++_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb
to main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb
gcc-defaults_1.106.dsc
to main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc-defaults_
gcc-defaults_1.106_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-defaults_1.106.dsc
gcc-defaults_1.106.tar.gz
libgcj-common_4.4.6-1_all.deb
cpp_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb
gcc_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb
gcc-multilib_4.6.1-1_amd64.deb
gdc_4.4.6-1_amd64.deb
g++_4.6.1-1_amd64
Your message dated Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:33:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630853: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.106
has caused the Debian Bug report #630853,
regarding cpp: multi-arch: foreign or multi-arch: allowed?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:33:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#568299: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.106
has caused the Debian Bug report #568299,
regarding Don't remove alternative on package upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:33:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#633073: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.106
has caused the Debian Bug report #633073,
regarding gcc-defaults: Please set default to 4.6 for sh4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.5-8
Severity: minor
The shell script below reproduces this problem. Notice that the
function name is incorrect (on my system the name shown is "T.4"). I
get this result when I run the script:
~$ sh t98.sh
t98.c: In function ‘T.4’:
t98.c:5: warning: assuming signed
Your message dated Sat, 09 Jul 2011 17:00:55 +0200
with message-id <4e186d27.8040...@debian.org>
and subject line closing obsolete report with no feedback
has caused the Debian Bug report #467341,
regarding rrdtool built with -O2 segfaults on arm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 631204 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49690
Bug #631204 [gfortran] gfortran 4.6 ICE ; gfc_typenode_for_spec, at
fortran/trans-types.c:1019
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49690'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 567533 oprofile
Bug #567533 [g++] -O interferes with debugging on amd64 (oprofile doesn't like
-fomit-frame-pointers)
Bug reassigned from package 'g++' to 'oprofile'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
reassign 567533 oprofile
thanks
On 01/29/2010 06:04 PM, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> Package: g++
>
> -O is turning on -fomit-frame-pointers on amd64, which interferes with
> debugging
> performance issues (because it prevents oprofile from generating callgraph
> information). "man g++" says
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 616296 serious
Bug #616296 [src:btrfs-tools] btrfs-tools: will FTBFS with gcc-4.6
Bug #625312 [src:btrfs-tools] btrfs-tools: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 565026 serious
Bug #565026 [libfreebob] libfreebob: ftbfs with gcc-4.5
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 564845 serious
Bug #564845 [acl2] acl2: ftbfs with gcc-4.5
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severit
23 matches
Mail list logo
